Reasonable Expectation of Confidentiality is the "Dispositive Question" for Determining the Existence of Work-Product Protection

more+
less-

The absence of a reasonable expectation of confidentiality in the content of an independent witness’ signed or recorded verbatim statement precludes a finding of work-product protection. That is what Petitioner Debra Coito’s Answering Brief on the Merits states in the case of Coito v. Superior Court (2010)182 Cal. App. 4th 758 which is currently pending in the California Supreme Court.

Petitioner demonstrates that California Courts have acknowledged that an expectation of confidentiality is an essential element of the work product doctrine not only in the context of waiver, but also in the context of establishing the protection in the first place.

Petitioner concludes that because the attorney involved in procuring a witness statement from an independent third-party witness cannot have a reasonable expectation that the content of the statement or the circumstances under which the statement was obtained will remain “confidential", the statement is not “work-product” thus making the statement discoverable.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Products Liability Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katherine Gallo, Esq., Law Offices of Katherine Gallo | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »