Recent Decision Illustrates Dangers of Uncritical Performance Evaluations


A recent decision of the California Court of Appeal illustrates the dangers of providing uncritical performance evaluations. In Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc., the appellate court held that an employee who used a cane made out a prima facie case of employment discrimination because he was fired for poor performance after previously receiving positive performance reviews. As a result, the employee was entitled to have a jury determine whether he had been fired because of his condition.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© TroyGould PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »