Recent Developments in Tax Related Matters

by Pessin Katz Law, P.A.
Contact

June and July, 2013 have born a number of new developments relating to tax related matters.  This article is designed to provide a synopsis of those that might be of interest to PK Law readers:

  • In Daley v. Mostoller (In re Daley) No. 12-6130, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12138 (6th Cir. June 17, 2013) the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a debtor’s granting of a lien on his IRA securing future debts that might arise with the debtor’s brokerage house, without actually securing an extension of credit from the brokerage house, did not disqualify the IRA from exempt status in the debtor’s later bankruptcy filing, contrary to a Department of Labor position and the position of the debtor’s bankruptcy trustee (Chapter 7) that it did do so.  The District Court ruled with the bankruptcy trustee but was reversed on appeal and the IRA was granted exempt status.
  • Montgomery v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2013-151 (June 17, 2013), set forth the Tax Court’s position, citing Underwood v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 468 (1975), aff’d 535 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1976), that: “The mere fact that the debtor defaults and thereby renders the guarantor liable…” was not sufficient to increase the taxpayers’ (husband and wife) basis in S corporation stock so as to permit significantly increased loss deductions following a corporate default on a loan.
  • Chief Counsel (CC) Notices are directives that provide interim guidance, furnish temporary procedures, describe changes in litigating positions, or announce personnel matters or other types of administrative information. Notices providing interim guidance or instructions to staff are designed to be incorporated into the Chief Counsel Directives Manual (CCDM), but are issued as Notices to provide immediate notification of important policy or procedural changes.  In Notice CC-2013-011, the IRS Chief Counsel Office directed its attorneys to no longer argue that the Tax Court should review “innocent spouse” determinations by the Service under section IRC 6015(f) for abuse of discretion or on the administrative record.  The direction was issued in light of the holding in Wilson v. Comm’r, 705 F. 3d 980 (9th Cir. 2013), aff’g T.C. Memo 2010-134, to which the IRS acquiesced (AOD 2012-07, I.R.B. 2013-25 (June 17, 2013), that the standard of review in IRC 6015(f) cases is “de novo” or “from the beginning”. 
  • In Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) 201324016 (an email memo from the Chief Counsel’s Office to an examiner), dealing with a deceased husband’s failure to file income tax returns for a number of years, the examiner was instructed that the decedent’s daughter, who was a joint tenant on a bank account with her husband, should not file returns for her late father.  (The father left no Will and there was no probate opened for his estate.)  Instead, the IRS should prepare returns under the authority of IRC 6020(b)(1) and “issue statutory notices”, presumably to the daughter, but that is unclear.
  • On June 24, 2013, in Graev v. Commissioner (140 T.C. No. 17), the Tax Court held that a contribution of cash and a conservation easement to a charitable organization were not to be allowed as deductions because they were “conditional gifts”.  The IRS successfully argued that a “side letter” in which the charity agreed to return the cash contribution and join in a process to remove the contribution of the “façade [conservation] easement” were charitable deductions to be denied to the taxpayer as not “so remote as to be negligible”, citing 26 C.F.R. 1.170A-1(e), 1.170A-7(a)(3) and 1.170A-14(g)(3), Income Tax Regs., thereby resulting in their characterization as “conditional gifts.”
  • In PLR 201326011 the taxpayer sought a ruling that a trust she created for the benefit of herself, as life income beneficiary, and her children, and which contained a limited power of appointment, was a “Grantor Trust” under IRC 671 so that she would be considered the owner of the income and the corpus of the trust for federal income tax purposes.  The IRS ruled that because the net income of the trust must be paid to the grantor at least annually, the grantor would be treated as the owner of the income of the trust.  Also, because the grantor had a limited power of appointment over the corpus of the trust and any accumulated income therefrom, and, by the terms of the trust capital gains are added to the trust corpus, the grantor would be treated as the owner of the corpus of the trust.
  • IRS Fact Sheet FS-2013-9, July 2013, reiterated the position of the IRS that employers are responsible for payroll and related taxes even if the payroll tax service used by an employer is defrauding the employer or not acting in its best interests.  The Fact Sheet outlines some steps employers ought to consider in hiring a payroll service and to attempt to protect an employer from “unscrupulous” ones. 
  • The mere right to insurance policy dividends, by itself, is not an “incident of ownership” under IRC 2042.  According to Chief Counsel Advice CCA 201328030, this is particularly true in those cases in which the dividends may be applied against a current premium, representing “…nothing more than a reduction in premiums paid rather than a right to the income of the policy.”
  • On July 15, 2013, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Nye v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2013-166, which held that a lump sum payment of alimony to a former wife, possibly payable after death to her estate under state law, was not deductible as “alimony” to the former husband.  The husband had begun to make periodic payments under a property settlement agreement which the former wife sought to modify.  They then proceeded to mediation over the matter and entered into a “Mediation Settlement Agreement” at the end of 2007 in which the former husband agreed to pay a lump sum to settle the alimony modification case and his obligation under the property settlement agreement.  In early January, 2008 the husband made payment and claimed a large deduction for alimony for the 2008 tax year.  The divorce court’s “modification judgment” relating to the case was entered on February 4, 2008, and it incorporated the “Mediation Settlement Agreement”.  The Tax Court held that under Florida law, as a matter of contract, that the agreement to pay the former spouse a lump sum under the Mediation Settlement Agreement would survive her death and, therefore, was not deductible as alimony under IRC 71.  The Mediation Agreement was silent on the issue.
  • Deseret Management Corp, (Ct. Fed. Cl., 7/31/2013) 112 AFTR 2d ¶ 2013-5151involved a claim by the owner of a radio station that the sale of the station involved no goodwill and a radio station could not have goodwill due to the nature of audiences’ listening tastes and habits.  The Court of Claims rejected that position and stated that radio stations could have goodwill represented in a sale of the station by the purchase price of the station over and above the value of assets sold, other than goodwill.  In the case at hand, the Court found that the goodwill attributable to the station’s sale was negligible.
  • Chief Counsel Advice 201330033 contains guidance on the manner in which the amount of a gift is to be determined for Self-Cancelling Installment Notes (“SCINs”) for gift tax purposes when there is an exchange of property for the SCIN.  Also, there is a discussion of whether such notes should be included in the holder’s gross estate for estate tax purposes.
  • A Federal District Court has ruled in Cozen O’Connor, P.C. v. Tobits, No. 2:11-cv-00045-CDJ (E.D. Pa. 7/29/13) that in light of the Supreme Court’s invalidation of DOMA, the same-sex spouse of a deceased profit sharing plan participant is entitled to spousal death benefits under the terms of the plan and ERISA.  Prior to the Supreme Court’s DOMA ruling, such same-sex spouses would not be entitled to spousal benefits under ERISA plans.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pessin Katz Law, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pessin Katz Law, P.A.
Contact
more
less

Pessin Katz Law, P.A. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!