In the past few months, we have seen an increasing number of hostile or unsolicited M&A bids where boards of directors of target companies have resisted bidders’ advances. Traditionally, the board-friendly Delaware approach, epitomized by its “just say no” jurisprudence, has made hostile bids both risky and uncertain. Nevertheless, hostile and unsolicited mergers and acquisitions so far this year have been at their highest levels worldwide since 2007, according to Thomson Reuters data. Including withdrawn deals like Pfizer’s US$118 billion bid for AstraZeneca, unsolicited deals comprised approximately 20 percent of worldwide M&A so far this year, which is the highest percentage in eight years.
Responsibilities of the board of directors of a company incorporated in Delaware and most other US jurisdictions are measured primarily by the business judgment rule, a fundamental corporate principle that essentially defers to the decision-making process of the directors themselves and that, absent special circumstances such as personal gain, presumes the propriety of the directors’ actions. The business judgment rule generally applies to the board’s consideration of an unsolicited or hostile offer, including the decision to engage in discussions with bidders, negotiate terms and, ultimately, accept or reject the unsolicited or hostile offer. The board of directors, as a general rule, has no fiduciary duty to negotiate |with third parties, or to sell the corporation, simply because a premium price is offered, if the board makes a good faith, informed decision that its actions are in the corporation’s best interests...
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.