Regulation of Compounding Pharmacies Continues to Evolve with House Passage of "Drug Quality and Security Act"

more+
less-
more+
less-

In the current environment it seems that few, if any, pieces of legislation are moving through Capitol Hill. However, there is one area that has seen significant activity: the regulation of compounding pharmacies. Specifically, there has been bipartisan support for legislation intended to bolster the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) oversight of compounding pharmacies in light of last year's unfortunate incidents involving compounded medications and meningitis. For example, H.R. 3089, also referred to as the "Compounding Clarity Act of 2013," received significant support from Representatives on both sides of the aisle when it was introduced on September 12, 2013. This led to the passage of the "Drug Quality and Security Act," H.R. 3204, which, according to the bill's sponsor, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, builds on the provisions of H.R. 3089 by eliminating the unconstitutional provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) that created uncertainty surrounding compounding laws, requiring the FDA to engage in two-way communication with state regulators and permitting entities that engage in pharmacy compounding to voluntarily register as "outsourcing facilities," making them subject to FDA current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs), risk based inspection provisions and other standards. The bill also includes provisions addressing drug supply chain security.

Voluntary Outsourcing Facilities

In contrast to H.R. 3089, which differentiated between traditional pharmacy compounding and "outsourcing" facilities based on the percentage of the facility's total compounded sterile drug products dispensed and shipped interstate, H.R. 3204 allows compounding pharmacies to voluntarily register with the FDA. The bill specifically states that an outsourcing facility is not required to be a licensed pharmacy and is not required to obtain prescriptions for identified patients, thus allowing outsourcing facilities to compound drugs pursuant to non-patient-specific purchase orders. Pharmacies that do not register as outsourcing facilities may be prohibited from compounding drug products without a valid prescription, and this could create an incentive for facilities to register as outsourcing facilities. Drugs compounded by a licensed pharmacist at registered outsourcing facilities would be exempt from FDA adequate directions for use, new drug application and approval and drug supply chain security requirements, so long as the following conditions are met:

  • Registration. Outsourcing facilities that elect to register with the FDA must pay an annual registration fee of $15,000.
  • Compounding Limitations. Registered outsourcing facilities are prohibited from compounding certain drugs, such as drugs that have had their approval withdrawn for safety reasons or drugs included on a newly created list maintained by the FDA of drugs or categories of drugs that are reasonably likely to lead to adverse effects.
  • Labeling. Drugs compounded by registered outsourcing facilities must be labeled in a manner that prominently identifies the drug as a compounded drug product.
  • Reporting. Registered outsourcing facilities must submit biannual reports identifying the drugs compounded by the facility for the prior six-month period and information concerning each drug. Registered outsourcing facilities also must report adverse events to the FDA.
  • Inspection. Registered outsourcing facilities will be subject to inspection by the FDA on a risk-based schedule that will consider factors such as the facility's compliance and recall history or the inherent risk of the drugs compounded at the facility to determine inspection frequency. Registered outsourcing facilities will be subject to "reinspection" fees should the FDA inspect the facility more than once in a given fiscal year.
  • Penalties. If a registered outsourcing facility fails to pay its registration and reinspection fees, all of the drugs compounded by the facility will be considered misbranded until payment of the outstanding fees.

Traditional Compounding and Communication With State Boards of Pharmacy

Like H.R. 3089, H.R. 3204 does not regulate traditional pharmacy compounding and, thus, allows state boards of pharmacy to retain primary oversight authority over such compounding activities. In addition, the bill provides for enhanced communications between the FDA and state boards of pharmacy by requiring that the FDA, in consultation with the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, implement a system by which state boards of pharmacy may submit information describing actions taken against compounding pharmacies within the state and reporting compounding pharmacies that may be in violation of federal law.

The bill also commissions a Government Accountability Office study to be submitted to Congress within three years of bill passage that includes a review of pharmacy compounding in each state, the laws and policies governing pharmacy compounding in each state and state enforcement of these provisions, the tools available to permit purchasers of compounded drugs to assess drug safety and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication system between the FDA and state boards of pharmacy.

Clarification of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

The bill also would modify multiple provisions in Section 503A of the FFDCA relating to pharmacy compounding. Specifically, provisions in 503A of the FFDCA prohibiting compounding pharmacies from advertising or promoting the compounding of any particular drug, class of drug or type of drug, would be struck from the FFDCA under the bill. However, the bill leaves the exemption from Section 351(a)(2)(B), 352(f)(1) and 355 in place for traditional pharmacy compounded products.

Issues to Consider With H.R. 3204

  • Sterile vs. Nonsterile Compounding. Under the bill, an outsourcing facility is defined as a facility that is "engaged in the compounding of sterile drug products." But what about pharmacies that provide compounded nonsterile topical or liquid medications?
  • Voluntary Outsourcing Facility Registration. While voluntary registration may provide outsourcing facilities with some benefits, including the ability to compound drugs pursuant to a non-patient-specific purchase order, it will be interesting to see if pharmacies believe the cost of compliance with the bill's requirements outweigh these benefits.
  • Animal Use. The bill's provisions apply only with respect to "human drug" compounding, even though a significant proportion of compounded drugs are intended for animal use. How will the bill affect compounding pharmacies that specialize in veterinary medication?
  • USP Adoption. Although the bill mentions United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards, it does not expressly adopt these standards or apply them to compounding pharmacies nationwide. What role will USP standards play in the regulation of compounding pharmacies if the bill becomes law?

As the regulatory landscape governing compounding pharmacies continues to evolve, it is important that pharmacies understand the changes to come and how those changes may affect their practice.

Topics:  Drug Compounding, FDA, Pharmacies

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Health Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »