Renkemeyer Compounds the Confusion in Characterizing Limited and General Partners—Part 2


Originally published in Journal of Taxation - June 2012.

This article focuses on the Tax Court’s curious opinion last year in Renkemeyer, Campbell & Weaver, LLP v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. In this case of first impression, the court ruled that members of a law firm operating as an LLP were not “limited partners” for purposes of avoiding self-employment tax under Section 1402(a)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code on their respective allocable shares of the partnership’s income. The author discusses how Renkemeyer sheds some light on the Tax Court’s characterization for tax purposes of members of LLPs and other unincorporated entities while simultaneously leaving many questions unanswered, raising additional questions, and creating more than a little confusion, and analyzes the characterization of members of unincorporated business entities as “limited partners” and “general partners” in light of Renkemeyer and other recent judicial developments.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Tax Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »