This is the companion Reply Brief addressing the opposition which argued that an expert can "speculate" as to one of many causes for an accident or injury. As set forth more fully in the Reply Brief, the cases cited by the opposition were inapplicable to the routine situation of an alleged slip and fall where there is simply no evidence of a dangerous condition from which and expert can base an opinion.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Procedure Updates, Personal Injury Updates
State, 9th Circuit, California |
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Barry P. Goldberg, A Professional Law Corporation | Attorney Advertising