Guggenheim Capital v. Toumei

Reply Brief of Appellant David Birnbaum

more+
less-

This is the reply brief in an appeal concerning the question of whether it is proper for a court to enter, as a sanction for litigation non-compliance, a default judgment and a seven-figure statutory damages award against a penurious individual who facing related (but ultimately abandoned) criminal charges arising from the same claims; who is unrepresented by civil counsel during the pendency of the default motion but has been advised by assigned criminal counsel not to do more than assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in the civil case; and who is accused of the “crime” of “wrongfully” using his own family name by the institutional holder of a registered trademark historically based on that same family name – conduct which, even upon the default entered against him, the district court acknowledged made him no money and regarding which there was no proof that it ever harmed the plaintiffs.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »