Mary Scott Doe et al. v. President Barack Hussein Obama et al.

Reply Brief of Appellants


In the consolidated appeal of two judgments dismissing the plaintiffs' complaints for lack of standing, plaintiffs-appellants argue that the plaintiff human embryos have standing, as human beings,to challenge the constitutionality and legality of President Obama's executive order lifting the partial ban on the use of federal funds to pay for human embryonic stem cell research. Plaintiffs-appellants further argue that the plaintiff parents seeking to adopt human embryos have third party standing to challenge the executive order.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Health Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, 4th Circuit, Maryland | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gary Cargill | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »