Mary Scott Doe et al. v. President Barack Hussein Obama et al.

Reply Brief of Appellants

more+
less-

In the consolidated appeal of two judgments dismissing the plaintiffs' complaints for lack of standing, plaintiffs-appellants argue that the plaintiff human embryos have standing, as human beings,to challenge the constitutionality and legality of President Obama's executive order lifting the partial ban on the use of federal funds to pay for human embryonic stem cell research. Plaintiffs-appellants further argue that the plaintiff parents seeking to adopt human embryos have third party standing to challenge the executive order.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, 4th Circuit, Maryland | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gary Cargill | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Gary Cargill on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×