TABOR FOUNDATION v. COLORADO BRIDGE ENTERPRISE, et al.

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

more+
less-

Defendants do not dispute that the bridge safety surcharge is a mandatory charge, assessed against TABOR Foundation members without regard to any benefits actually conferred. Nor do Defendants raise any material dispute as to their own documentary evidence, which shows that the CBE has received grants from the State of Colorado in excess of ten percent of its revenue.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jim Manley | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Jim Manley on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×