TABOR FOUNDATION v. COLORADO BRIDGE ENTERPRISE, et al.

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

more+
less-

Defendants do not dispute that the bridge safety surcharge is a mandatory charge, assessed against TABOR Foundation members without regard to any benefits actually conferred. Nor do Defendants raise any material dispute as to their own documentary evidence, which shows that the CBE has received grants from the State of Colorado in excess of ten percent of its revenue.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Government Contracting Updates, Transportation Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jim Manley | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »