In both its response to defendants’ argument for dismissal of the UIGEA charges and of the IGBA charges, the government runs from the language of the statute, which, in each case,requires dismissal of the charges against defendants. Defendants demonstrate in their opening briefs that the express language of Section 5362(2) of UIGEA exempts financial transaction providers like Mr. Campos and Mr. Elie from prosecution under UIGEA. See Campos Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss1 5-12; Elie UIGEA Br. 3-10. Defendants also have demonstrated that under long-standing judicial interpretations of the phrase “business of betting or wagering,” the poker companies in this case,which hosted online poker play by others in exchange for a fee, are not in the “business of betting or wagering” under UIGEA. Finally, the term “subject to chance” as used in UIGEA is hopelessly vague as applied to online poker, such that defendants’ rights to due process and fair notice are violated by this prosecution. Boxed into a corner, the government seeks to avoid dismissal of the UIGEA counts by distorting the statute and mischaracterizing defendants’ straightforward arguments. But, as explained at length herein, these tactics are unavailing. Nor has the government rebutted defendants’ arguments in favor of dismissing the IGBA counts. The government’s opposition to these arguments is based on a core assumption: that Internet poker is prohibited under IGBA. But while the government’s brief is long on colorful
history—from Mississippi riverboats to country music tunes—it is short on what matters: the text that Congress used when it enacted IGBA. Here, as always, that language is determinative.
What it shows is that Internet poker is not covered by the terms of the statute.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Business Organization Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Ian Imrich, Law Offices of Ian J. Imrich, APC | Attorney Advertising