Retailers NOT Required to Maintain AEDs

more+
less-

On June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court announced that retailers are not obligated to maintain automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in anticipation of medical emergencies. In Verdugo v. Target Corporation, the state’s highest court held that the burden retailers would face in acquiring and maintaining AEDs outweighed the foreseeability of harm.

The underlying case involved a 49-year-old developmentally disabled shopper who died after experiencing sudden cardiac arrest while at a California Target store. The store did not have an AED nor an employee trained to use one.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Medical Devices, Retailers, Target

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »