Rhode Island Usury: Interest By Any Other Name Is Still Interest


In LaBonte v. New England Development R.I., LLC et al., No 12-328, the Rhode Island Supreme Court recently clarified the state’s usury law by holding that a fee could be included in the calculation of interest even though it was nominally exempt.  This case involved a private loan for $275,000 that required repayment of $325,000 in 30 days.  The loan agreement and related documents provided that the borrower would pay the additional $50,000 at the time of repayment as a loan commitment fee.  Under the Rhode Island usury statute (R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2), commercial loan commitment and availability fees are deemed not to constitute interest.

The statute defines commercial loan commitment or availability fees as charges imposed by lenders “to assure the availability of a specified amount of credit for a specified period of time or, at the borrower’s option, compensating balances in lieu of the fees.”  In the LaBonte case, the $50,000 fee did not provide any assurance as to the availability of the $275,000 principal loan, nor was it accompanied by any borrower option to increase the amount of the loan.  In light of these facts, the Court ruled that the loan commitment fee did not fall within the statutory exemption and must be considered interest.

The parties did not dispute that, if considered interest, the loan commitment fee rendered the loan usurious, but the lender argued for the application of a usury savings clause in the loan agreement.  Earlier in the 2014 term, however, the Court held that such clauses are unenforceable in Rhode Island.  NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital LLC, 84 A.3d 800 (R.I. 2014).  Thus, the loan was void.

This case serves as cautionary tale to lenders in Rhode Island, particularly private lenders who are – as the defendant in LaBonte described itself – perhaps less sophisticated than commercial banks about the usury laws.  Rhode Island courts will look past the terminology employed in the loan agreements and examine fees and costs associated with the loan to determine if those fees and costs should be deemed interest.  The remedy for violation of the usury statute is severe and parties cannot avoid it through a savings clause in the loan agreement.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.