Robins Kaplan Justice Report Fall 2020 | VOL. 14 NO. 4

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact

Marquardt v. Schaffhausen, 941 N.W.2d 715 (Minn. 2020), for example, is a medical malpractice action where Patricia Marquardt suffered a brain injury when she developed an untreated infection after undergoing a knee replacement surgery. Mrs. Marquardt’s trial counsel secured a hardfought and well-deserved verdict against her orthopedic surgeon. After the verdict, the doctor moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that Mrs. Marquardt’s experts lacked foundation to testify as to the cause of her injuries. The district court denied those motions, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial on the grounds that the experts were not qualified to testify as to causation.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robins Kaplan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Robins Kaplan LLP
Contact
more
less

Robins Kaplan LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide