Rogers Towers: Copyright Issues Arise in Custom Residential Home Construction


Are you anxious to build a custom home after the economy recovers? Are you a builder or architect looking to rekindle your business? Now may be the time to consider the labyrinth of copyright issues that may arise in custom residential home construction. Twenty years after enactment of the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (“Act”), there remains significant misunderstandings about what actions constitute infringement of protected architectural works. Under the Act, one form of infringement can occur by merely building a structure from copyrighted plans, and courts have extended liability to architects, builders, and even home purchasers under the theories of vicarious infringement and active inducement.

A common scenario arises where a prospective home purchaser considers a variety of preexisting floor plans and home designs to customize a dream home. After selecting certain features from prior designs, the purchaser may approach a builder for cost and constructability estimates. Before construction, either party may engage an architect to finalize the building plans. When the home is built, an unrelated copyright owner suddenly steps forward claiming infringement of a preexisting set of plans. Under the United States Copyright Act, the copyright owner can seek statutory damages of up to $150,000 for each act of “willful infringement” by the builder, the architect, and the purchaser.

To avoid infringement accusations, prior to preparation of the custom plans each party should be clear on what prior designs were used by the home purchaser to develop his or her set of customized design features, and with whom the prior designs originated. Seasoned architects and builders will know the importance of securing the appropriate permission to use prior designs, especially when the purchaser is unfamiliar with the residential home building industry and the copyright issues involved. However, in many instances the originator of preexisting plans cannot be identified or located, and to prevent delays and other business disruptions, many builders and architects have acquired insurance policies covering acts of copyright infringement. In other scenarios, contractual indemnities may be used to allocate protection between the home builder, architect, and purchaser. The intellectual property attorneys at Rogers Towers have significant experience in navigating these complex legal issues.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Rogers Towers | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.