Schedule Is Extended On Motion Of Intervenor

Morris James LLP
Contact

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Humedica, Inc, C.A. No. 14-880-LPS-CJB, April 8, 2015.

Burke, C. J.  Intervenor’s motion to modify the schedule is granted.

A non-party intervenor acquired the patents-in-suit after the complaint was filed and a scheduling order was entered in this action.  It sought a 30-day extension for the deadlines for producing an initial claim chart, for defendant’s submission of invalidity contentions, and motions to join other parties and amend or supplement pleadings.  Defendant was willing to agree to a 14-day extension, but opposed the 30-day extension claiming it could potentially prejudice its ability to adequately prepare IPR petitions.  The court finds that good cause exists for granting the motion, noting that the intervenor has acted diligently.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide