A recent Illinois Appellate Court case reaffirms the requirements that school board members not hold conflicting positions during their service on the board, and highlights the method by which board members may be removed from office when they have a conflict of position. In People v. Niekamp, the Appellate Court held that a school board member was properly removed from his office as a school board member by a trial court. The board member was serving on the county board at the time he took the oath of office for his school board position. The board member had a conflict of position under Section 1 of Public Officer Prohibited Activities Act.
The court held that the process by which the school board member was removed from office was proper, even though the petition to the court was brought by fellow board members, not the Illinois Attorney General or State’s Attorney. Although the type of proceeding at issue—a quo warranto proceeding—may be brought by those public officials it may also be brought by individual citizens who have a sufficient interest in the outcome of the proceedings. Because the vote of the one board member could be dispositive on issues that came before the board, the other board members had a sufficient interest to challenge the board member’s conflict.
Please see full article below for further information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.