SDNY Bankruptcy Court Holds that “Soft Dollar” Claims Are Not Customer Claims Under SIPA

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Contact

[authors: Casey Servais, Nicole M. Stephansen]

On July 10, 2012, Judge James M. Peck of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that so-called “soft dollar” claims do not qualify for treatment as customer claims under the Securities Investor Protection Act. The decision represents the first time that any court has been asked to determine the status of “soft dollar” claims under SIPA. In re Lehman Brothers Inc., No. 08-01420, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 3103 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. July 10, 2012).

Background

In the securities industry, “soft dollar” credits are amounts allocated from brokerage commissions and held for clients in a separate account to pay for the research component of a broker-dealer’s array of services. Generally speaking, the soft dollar component of a brokerage commission consists of the difference between the commission rate a money manager pays to a broker-dealer for executing a trade and providing additional services, and the lowest available rate the money manager could have paid solely for the execution of that trade without the services.

Without the institution of “soft dollars,” money managers would face liability for a breach of their fiduciary duty to obtain “best execution” any time they paid a commission rate higher than the lowest available commission rate for the execution of a particular trade. The concept of “soft dollars,” however, allows money managers to consider factors other than the commission rate in choosing a broker-dealer. Specifically, section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act creates a safe harbor that permits money managers to select a broker-dealer charging higher commission rates based on the “brokerage and research services” the more expensive broker-dealer provides. See 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(e). Credits reflecting the “soft dollar” portion of the brokerage commission are often held in special accounts at the broker-dealer, where they can only be used to pay for research and other services falling within the section 28(e) safe harbor.

Prior to its liquidation, the debtor in the case, Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”), was the U.S. broker-dealer arm of Lehman Brothers Holdings. On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for bankruptcy, and a few days later the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order commencing a SIPA liquidation of LBI. Following the commencement of the SIPA case, money managers who had paid commissions to LBI asserted claims against the LBI estate for soft dollar credits held for their benefit in segregated LBI accounts. A small percentage of these claimants filed their soft dollar claims as “customer claims,” which are entitled to a higher priority than general unsecured claims under SIPA.

Protection under SIPA only extends to those creditors who meet the definition of “customer,” a term that is construed narrowly under SIPA. After reviewing these soft dollar claims, the SIPA trustee for the LBI estate issued letters of determination that the holders of soft dollar claims were not “customers” under SIPA and thus, the soft dollar claims could not be treated as customer claims. The trustee then filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking an order confirming this determination. Fifteen soft dollar claimants filed objections to the trustee’s motion.

Analysis

In confirming the trustee’s determination that the soft dollar claims are not customer claims, the Bankruptcy Court focused its analysis on SIPA’s definition of “customer.”

Under SIPA, the definition of “customer” primarily encompasses two types of creditors: (i) any person who has a claim on account of securities received, acquired, or held by the debtor in the ordinary course of its business as a broker or dealer from or for the securities accounts of such person for certain specified purposes, and (ii) any person who has deposited cash with the debtor for the purpose of purchasing securities. See 15 U.S.C. § 78lll. The court acknowledged that in applying the definition of “customer” under SIPA, a particular creditor of an insolvent broker-dealer might qualify as a “customer” with respect to some of its claims but not with respect to others. Thus, even though the soft dollar claimants indisputably qualified as customers with respect to some of their transactions with LBI, the court found that in their capacity as holders of soft dollar credits, these claimants did not fit into either prong of the “customer” definition.

The court found that the soft dollar credits are “plainly not securities,” so the soft dollar creditors did not have a claim “on account of securities.” Additionally, the court held that in order to qualify for standing as a customer, “purpose matters and cash must have been deposited with the broker-dealer for the purpose of purchasing securities.” (emphasis in original). The Section 28(e) safe harbor explicitly states that the soft dollar credits have a particular purpose – to obtain research – and under no circumstances could the credits be used to purchase securities. Accordingly, the court held that “credits that only may be applied to cover the cost of market research are too remote, indirect and tangential to satisfy the customer definition in SIPA.”

The soft dollar claimants asserted several other arguments to get around the SIPA definition of “customer,” but the court found each of these arguments unpersuasive. For example, the claimants argued that the soft dollar claims meet the SIPA definition of “customer property.” Under SIPA, “customer property” includes “cash and securities . . . at any time received, acquired or held by or for the account of a debtor from or for the securities account of a customer.” See 15 U.S.C. § 78lll. The court found that the soft dollar credits did not qualify as securities, and that they were not cash or cash equivalents. Instead, the court found that “[s]oft dollars function something like frequent flyer miles: they are a specialized form of currency that may be redeemed solely as a means to pay for research services and other services provided by a broker-dealer to its customers. They are a kind of credit available to a customer, not unrestricted cash that can be spent freely.” Accordingly, the soft dollar claims also did not meet the SIPA definition of “customer property.”

The court held:

Because soft dollar credits are an accepted method to allocate and account for incremental commission expenses charged by a broker-dealer in executing securities trades and because these credits cannot ever be used to purchase securities, credit balances held in soft dollar accounts do not qualify for the enhanced customer protection afforded by SIPA. Customers with claims based on soft dollars instead have claims for breach of contract (on account of the failure to apply the credits as promised to pay for services) and are only able to recover on these claims as unsecured creditors of LBI.

LBI had promised to provide research services in exchange for these credits and then had failed to do so. The court looked to existing case law that clearly establishes that in a SIPA case, breach of contract claims have the status of general unsecured claims rather than customer claims. Consequently, the Court held that the soft dollar claims were not customer claims entitled to priority under SIPA, rather they were general unsecured claims.

Conclusion

The status of soft dollar claims under SIPA is a matter of first impression for any court, and this decision relegates these claims to general unsecured status. This ruling limits the claims entitled to higher priority customer treatment under SIPA, increasing the potential pool of unsecured claims.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Contact
more
less

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.