SEC and DOJ Hacking Prosecutions Highlight SEC’s Increased Interest in Cybersecurity Risks

by Morgan Lewis
Contact

Companies are reminded of the need for strong internal controls.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) recently filed civil and criminal actions in the largest hacking and securities fraud scheme of its kind ever prosecuted.[1] During a five-year period, the defendants allegedly stole approximately 150,000 confidential press releases from the servers of three newswire companies that contained information prepared by scores of public companies. Unbeknownst to the companies, the defendant hackers, who appear to all be foreign nationals, then sold the press releases to traders who traded ahead of the confidential information’s public release and reaped millions of dollars in illegal profits.

This case highlights the need for companies to ensure that they have adequate internal controls that cover data transfer at all stages of the use and life cycle. Any weak link in a cybersecurity program may be exploited or used by hackers as a back door to gain access to information. In this case, the cyber attack targeted third-party newswires and not the companies that originally created and possessed the information. A strong cybersecurity program is essential for companies to protect valuable and sensitive information and to avoid possible enforcement actions, fines, reputational harm, loss of business, and class action or other lawsuits brought for damages suffered by customers or clients.

The SEC’s focus is not limited to public companies. Recent findings by the SEC confirm the widespread nature of cybersecurity attacks in the financial industry. In February 2015, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspectors and Examinations (OCIE) released a Risk Alert announcing that it had examined scores of broker-dealers and investment advisers’ cybersecurity protocols.[2] Among the areas that the Risk Alert report focused on were identification and assessment of cybersecurity risks, risk associated with vendors and other third parties’ systems, detection of unauthorized activity, risks associated with remote customer access, and the absence of a chief information security officer and/or cyber insurance.[3]  Strikingly, OCIE  found that 88% of the broker-dealers and 74% of the investment advisers examined had experienced a cyber attack, either directly or through a vendor.[4]

The SEC’s increased emphasis on the adequacy of internal controls (generally) and cybersecurity at all stages of data transfer (specifically) should particularly interest public companies and financial institutions in their approach to detecting and mitigating cyber risks.

The Attack Targeted Newswires, Not Companies

In the newswires cases, although the material, nonpublic information belonged to public companies, the hackers did not attack the companies directly; rather, they focused on the three newswires. As alleged by the government, the public companies uploaded draft releases to the newswires’ restricted, nonpublic servers pursuant to contractual relationships whereby the newswires agreed to keep the information confidential until public release. The press releases contained material nonpublic information about publicly traded companies, including unreleased earnings, revenue, and mergers information. In one instance, the defendants were able to access and trade on information in the 36 minutes between when the newswire received the information and its public release.

The government alleged that the hackers used a range of strategies—some rather simple, such as phishing email and stolen login information, and some more advanced, such as SQL injection attacks[5] and brute force attacks[6] to access the newswires’ servers. For years, the hackers allegedly possessed contact and credential information for one newswire’s employees, clients, and business partners. As alleged in one indictment, web server logs from one newswire show repeated and regular improper accesses to its servers.

Rather than attacking each public company, it is clear that the defendant hackers recognized that the newswires offered one single repository and single access point to highly valuable, confidential information about hundreds of companies. The newswires may have also presented a weak link by having weaker cybersecurity measures than the public companies themselves.

As the scheme matured and its success grew, traders allegedly sent “wish lists” of the publicly traded companies about which they sought inside information. The DOJ and SEC alleged the following lucrative nature of the scheme: the hackers obtained confidential information about hundreds of public companies, and the trader defendants executed approximately 1,000 inside-the-window trades, resulting in $30 million in profits.

The SEC has previously targeted hackers who obtain and trade insider information. In 2007, the SEC brought an enforcement action against a computer hacker who accessed confidential quarterly earnings reports by hacking into an investor’s public relations firm and obtaining material nonpublic information about upcoming negative earnings of a publicly traded company. In 2010, the hacker was ordered to pay roughly $580,000 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty.[7]

A Strong Detection System Is Necessary for Avoiding Liability

Companies must have a robust system in place, based on internal controls, to prevent, detect, and mitigate direct and indirect cyber attacks. Experts agree that the question is no longer whether an organization will suffer a cybersecurity breach, but when a breach will occur—or whether a breach has already occurred, as yet undetected by the company. Indeed, in the current environment, the key to fighting a cyber attack may be an organization’s ability to detect and quickly respond to a breach when it inevitably does occur. Although these recent enforcement actions targeted intentional efforts to steal and profit on material nonpublic information, the SEC’s focus goes beyond cybersecurity and insider trading. SEC Chair Mary Jo White has made clear that the agency will continue to bring actions against companies for inadequate internal controls under the “Broken Windows” theory.[8]

The SEC recently brought an action for failing to have adequate controls in place.[9] It also reportedly asked eight listed companies to provide information on data breaches in connection with a sophisticated hacking group “that has tried to hack into emails at more than 100 companies looking for information on mergers and other market moving events.”[10] In a June 25 speech, SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar emphasized that the SEC is “proactively examining how it can bring more cybersecurity enforcement actions” and suggested the need for further SEC guidance.[11] The SEC has also noted that companies may have disclosure obligations after a cyber attack.[12]

Other Recent Enforcement Developments

Other federal and state agencies are also initiating aggressive enforcement actions when a company fails to have an adequate cybersecurity program, and the courts have been validating these enforcement efforts. As most recently evidenced by the FTC v. Wyndham decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit agreed that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had stated a claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices by, inter alia, alleging that the defendant, which experienced three cyber attacks resulting in a theft of consumer data, had not used commercially reasonable methods for protecting consumer data and overstated its cybersecurity protections in its published privacy policy.[13] Further, the Third Circuit rejected the defendant’s argument that it did not have fair notice of its cybersecurity obligations, citing past FTC actions regarding cybersecurity.

This case confirms that companies’ failure to adequately protect valuable and sensitive confidential and customer information may result in an enforcement action. FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez noted that the Third Circuit’s “decision reaffirms the FTC’s authority to hold companies accountable for failing to safeguard consumer data. It is not only appropriate, but critical, that the FTC has the ability to take action on behalf of consumers when companies fail to take reasonable steps to secure sensitive consumer information.”[14]

Preventing and Responding to Data Security Breaches and Keeping Ahead of the Changing Regulatory Environment

What can you do today to protect data? Be proactive. Here are some recommended steps that companies can take now to prevent cybersecurity loss and to strengthen your cybersecurity program.

  1. Protect Valuable Data
    Effective cybersecurity requires a tailored program to protect data that may be at risk. Companies should first identify information of value, such as trade secrets, other intellectual property, confidential business or customer information, or financial assets. A risk assessment should be conducted to mitigate against any weak links that hackers or insiders may exploit. An information protection plan should be carefully tailored and designed to protect the information against risk of attack, theft, or loss.

    Hackers come in all forms with different agendas, from profiteer to “hacktivist.” Do you understand which information hackers value and which will cause your company harm? Is high-value information found in multiple locations, including some that might be more vulnerable than others? Have you assessed possible weak links, such as third parties?
  1. Manage Cyber Risk
    Enforcers expect that companies have appropriate oversight and review controls to manage cyber risk. Commissioner Aguilar noted on this point, “Given the significant cyber-attacks that are occurring with disturbing frequency, and the mounting evidence that companies of all shapes and sizes are increasingly under a constant threat of potentially disastrous cyber-attacks, ensuring the adequacy of a company’s cybersecurity measures needs to be a critical part of a board of director’s risk oversight responsibilities.”[15]

    Consider the following: How do you manage cyber risk? Do you have dedicated information security personnel? Is your board of directors cyber savvy, educated on cybersecurity risks, and able to conduct appropriate oversight, such as reviewing budgets for cybersecurity programs and receiving reports on breaches and risks? Does your board’s risk committee consider cyber risks? Does your company have cyber insurance that covers not only the breach, but also data loss and restoration of services?
  1. Monitor and Detect
    Have a clear understanding of your company’s ability to monitor and detect attacks. The ability to detect cyber intrusions and attempted intrusions is critical to stopping access. Do you have a detection program in place? How good is it? How well are you monitoring for cyber threats and attacks? In the attack discussed above, the allegations suggest that the newswires varied widely in their detection abilities. The SEC has repeatedly noted the value of detection and monitoring cyber attacks.
  1. Prepare and Test Incident Response Plans
    Does your company’s data response plan include a data map that shows your systems, data, needs, and risks? Does it address detection and monitoring of risk, as well as remediation? Does it show when and to whom confidential information is transferred? Does it include third parties that have access to your company’s confidential information? Does the data breach identify a response team, including your internal contacts and decisionmakers as well as outside contacts, including counsel, insurance, crisis management, and the appropriate law enforcement? When was the last time that you tested your data response plan?
  1. Third-Party Vulnerabilities
    Review your contracts with third parties and insurance coverage for third-party breaches. The SEC has mentioned third-party vendors as an area of concern, and the recent indictments demonstrate that hackers are targeting third parties. A hack of your company’s information by a third party is still a data breach of your information. Have you done due diligence with regard to the cybersecurity system used by third-party vendors? Do your contracts with third-party vendors that have access to your company’s confidential information clearly outline obligations in the event of a data breach and cyber attack? Does the third party have appropriate insurance coverage for cyber risks?
  1. Assess and Audit
    Consider auditing a third-party vendor’s cybersecurity protocol. Again, a hack of your company’s information from a third party is still a data breach of your information. What is your obligation to make sure that your confidential information shared with a third party is protected? Are the third parties that your company trusts with sensitive data taking appropriate steps to protect your confidential data? What is your liability for a breach at a third party? These issues need to be discussed.


[1] United States v. Turchynov, et al., Crim. No. 15-cr-390 (MCA) (D.N.J.); United States v. Kochevsky, et al., Crim. No. 15-cr-381 (E.D.N.Y.) and Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dubovoy et al., Civ. No. 15-cv-6076-MCA (D.N.J.); Press Release, US Department of Justice, Nine People Charged In Largest Known Computer Hacking And Securities Fraud Scheme (Aug. 11, 2015), available here; Press Release, SEC, SEC Charges 32 Defendants in Scheme to Trade on Hacked News Releases (Aug. 11, 2015), available here.

[2] SEC, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, Cybersecurity Examination Sweep Summary, National Exam Program Risk Alert, Vol. IV, Issue 4 (Feb. 3, 2015), available here.

[3] See our February 2015 LawFlash, SEC and FINRA Publish Materials Addressing Cybersecurity

[4] OCIE found that most broker-dealers incorporate requirements relating to cybersecurity risk into their contracts with vendors and business partners (72%) while only a few investment advisers were found to have incorporated such requirements (24%). Similarly, only a slim majority of broker-dealers maintain policies and procedures related to information security training for vendors and business partners authorized to access their networks (51%), whereas fewer than 15% of investment advisers have such policies (13%). Id.

[5] SQL injection attacks are methods of gaining access to computers connected to the Internet by using malicious SQL instructions (SQL is a computer programming language to retrieve and manage data in a computer database).

[6] “Brute force” refers to a method of decrypting data through exhaustive efforts that can be used to reveal unencrypted passwords.

[7] SEC v. Dorozhko, Civ. A. No. 07 Civ. 9606 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y.); Press Release, SEC, SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Against Computer Hacker For Insider Trading (March 29, 2010), available here.

[8] Mary Jo White, SEC Chair, Remarks at the Securities Enforcement Forum (Oct. 9, 2013), available here.

[9] Evan Charkes, SEC focuses Attention on Chief Compliance Officers, N.Y. L. J. (Aug. 13, 2015), available here.

[10] Sarah N. Lynch & Joseph Menn, Exclusive: SEC hunts hackers who stole corporate emails to trade stocks, Reuters (June 24, 2015), available here.

[11]Luis A. Aguilar, SEC Commissioner,  A Threefold Cord — Working Together to Meet the Pervasive Challenge of Cyber-Crime(June 25, 2105), available here.

[12] SEC, CF Disclosure Guidance: Topic No. 2, Cybersecurity (Oct. 13, 2011), available here.

[13] F.T.C. v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., _ F.3d _, No. 14-3514, 2015 WL 4998121 (3d Cir. Aug. 24, 2015), available here.

[14] Statement from FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez on Appellate Ruling in the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts Matter (Aug. 24, 2015), available here.

[15] Luis A. Aguilar, SEC Commissioner, Boards of Directors, Corporate Governance and Cyber-Risks: Sharpening the Focus (June 10, 2014), available here.

Written by:

Morgan Lewis
Contact
more
less

Morgan Lewis on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!