SEC Changes Course: Some Companies Must Now Admit Wrongdoing

by Saul Ewing LLP
Contact

In Brief

  • More defendants in cases brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission will face the possibility of making an admission of misconduct under a change in the policy on “no admit, no deny” settlements.
  • The SEC’s perceived need to create public accountability is driving this change.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has changed its policy concerning “no admit, no deny” settlements to require admissions of misconduct in some settlements. SEC officials have attributed the change to the public’s demand for acceptance of responsibility and accountability in some enforcement cases. While the SEC will continue its traditional practice of entering into no admit, no deny settlements, the SEC will now require some settlements to include admissions of misconduct.

Speaking at an event last month that was covered by the Bloomberg BNA White Collar Crime Report, SEC Enforcement Division Director Andrew Ceresney said that requiring an admission of misconduct “allows for something of a public catharsis, and the public is left with no reason to doubt the facts alleged, and the message of the case is unambiguous and unequivocal.” In a June 2013 article in The New York Times, the recently confirmed chairwoman of the SEC, Mary Jo White, said at a separate event, “There’s no question I share the desire for more accountability in cases where that is warranted. I do think there are situations where public accountability is particularly important, and that will be our focus. I don’t want to overstate this – no admit, no deny will still be the way most cases are resolved – but I think it’s an important change.”

Exemplifying this new approach is a recent consent agreement between the SEC and Harbinger Capital, a hedge fund led by Andrew Falcone. Although the parties had originally agreed to a no admit, no deny deal, it was rejected by a majority of the SEC’s commissioners in July. As part of a revised agreement, Falcone and Harbinger had to admit to wrongdoing and pay penalties of $18 million, and Falcone is barred from the securities industry for five years.

Exactly which cases, and how many, will result in admissions of wrongdoing remains to be seen. But an internal SEC enforcement memo discussing the policy change cites three criteria where the SEC may insist that a company admit wrongdoing: “misconduct that harmed large numbers of investors or placed investors or the market at risk of potentially serious harm;” “egregious intentional misconduct;” or “when the defendant engaged in unlawful obstruction of the commission’s investigative processes.”

The policy change follows years of criticism that the SEC has been too lenient, especially with large institutions that were at the center of the financial crisis. Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase were among the defendants that settled charges related to the financial crisis while neither admitting nor denying guilt, although Goldman was required to admit that its marketing materials were incomplete.

Some of the fiercest criticism has come from the courts. We have written previously here about Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, who ruled in late 2011 that he couldn’t assess the fairness of the SEC’s settlement with Citigroup in a complex mortgage case without knowing what, if anything, Citigroup had actually done. (See story here.) In his ruling, he said that settling with defendants who neither admit nor deny the allegations is a policy “hallowed by history but not by reason.” Judge Rakoff described the settlement – for $285 million – as “pocket change” for a giant bank like Citigroup. Other judges have followed Judge Rakoff’s lead, and an appeal of his Citigroup ruling is pending before the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The SEC is not alone in the way it settles enforcement actions. Like other federal regulatory agencies, the SEC has historically settled all its cases on a no admit, no deny basis. According to Ceresney in the Bloomberg report, “ … the SEC has been incredibly successful in achieving great settlements with this policy. In the majority of cases, settling on a no admit, no deny basis makes good sense, as the policy provides swift remedies for misconduct and quick relief to investors while allowing the commission to conserve its precious resources and avoid litigation risk.”

Even so, White, Ceresney, and other SEC officials reviewed that approach to settlements. Ceresney said in the Bloomberg report that the agency “concluded that there are some cases where the need for accountability and acceptance of responsibility is so important that we should be demanding admissions or else pursuing those cases to trial. In other words, an admission should be an indispensable element of the settlement.”

And if a company refuses to concede wrongdoing, the SEC professes to be ready to go to trial. “The possibility of more litigation does not deter us… . If we end up litigating more frequently we will shift our resources as necessary… and we are more than willing to try cases if need be,” Ceresney said in the Bloomberg report.

There’s little doubt that extracting admissions of wrongdoing gives the SEC new leverage, and not just because defendants want to avoid the damage to their reputation that comes with admitting misconduct. Private litigants in civil lawsuits will likely seize upon any admission, with potentially devastating financial consequences. If a company admits culpability to the SEC, plaintiffs in private shareholder litigation could use such an admission to reap hundreds of millions or billions of dollars in damages. These considerations can impact the strategic calculus for many corporations and individuals who are negotiating with the SEC, and Saul Ewing’s White Collar and Government Enforcement Practice will continue to track the SEC’s approach in these cases and keep you informed.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact
more
less

Saul Ewing LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.