SEC Denies Another Whistleblower Claim

The SEC has denied granting an award to another whistleblower in the second action of this year.  The SEC determined that the whistleblower did not provide any “original information.”   Under Rule 21F-4(b)(1)(iv), information will be considered “original information” only if it was provided to the Commission for the first time after July 21, 2010.   The SEC is not saying the information wasn’t helpful, it was just provided before the Dodd-Frank Act.  So the last couple of actions do not really portray a trend  as to how the SEC will ultimately interpret the term “original information.”  Sometimes the early bird doesn’t get the worm I guess.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.