SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues New C&DIs Relating to Social Media Use

more+
less-

On April 21, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) regarding the use of social media in the context of securities offerings, business combination transactions and other similar transactions, providing guidance to issuers seeking to use social media in compliance with certain SEC rules, including rules requiring the inclusion of legends in various public communications. 

In a series of C&DIs, the staff identified circumstances where hyperlinks could be used to satisfy requirements that communications made in reliance upon certain SEC rules be accompanied by lengthy cautionary legends. C&DIs 110.01, 164.02 and 232.15 clarify that the staff will not object to the use of hyperlinks to satisfy the requirement that legends accompany electronic communications made in reliance upon specified sections of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and the Exchange Act of 1934 in various contexts, including in connection with securities offerings, business combination transactions, proxy solicitations and tender offers, where: (1) the electronic communication is distributed through a platform, such as Twitter, that has technological limitations on the number of characters or amount of text that may be included in the communication; (2) including the required legend in its entirety, together with the other information, would cause the communication to exceed the limit on the number of characters or amount of text; and (3) the communication contains an active hyperlink to the required legend and prominently conveys, through introductory language or otherwise, that important or required information is provided through the hyperlink.   

In addition, C&DIs 110.02 and 232.16 provide guidance regarding an issuer’s responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable SEC rules (in particular, Securities Act Rules 134 or Rule 433) by third parties who retransmit (by “re-Tweeting” in the case of Twitter, for example) communications made by the issuer in reliance upon those rules on an electronic or social media platform that allows such re-transmission. The Division of Corporation Finance clarified that if a third party is neither an offering participant nor acting on behalf of the issuer or an offering participant, and the issuer has no involvement in that third party’s retransmission beyond having initially prepared and distributed the communication in compliance with applicable SEC rules, the retransmission would not be attributable to the issuer.

Topics:  Compliance, Corporate Financing, SEC, Social Media

Published In: Communications & Media Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »