SEC Issues Frequently Asked Questions on Exemption from Broker-Dealer Registration Under the JOBS Act

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets has issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) that provide guidance on the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Section 201(c) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Section 201(c) of the JOBS Act adds Section 4(b) to the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) to provide that persons participating in an offering under Rule 506 of the Securities Act are not subject to broker-dealer registration solely because (i) that person maintains a platform or mechanism that permits the offer, sale, purchase, negotiation, general solicitation or advertisements or similar or related activities by issuers of such securities; (ii) that person or any person associated with that person co-invests in such securities; or (iii) that person or any person associated with that person provides ancillary services with respect to such securities. In addition, that person and each person associated with that person may not (i) receive compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of such security, (ii) have possession of customer funds or securities in connection with the purchase or sale of such security, and (iii) be subject to a statutory disqualification as defined under Section 3(a)(39) of the Securities Act.

In the FAQs, the SEC clarified that the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Section 4(b) of the Securities Act (Section 4(b) Exemption) is fully operational and does not require the SEC to issue or adopt any rules. The Section 4(b) Exemption is only available to those persons who do not receive any compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. This restriction is not limited to transaction-based compensation. The SEC advised that it interprets the term “compensation” broadly to include any direct or indirect economic benefit to such persons. However, the SEC provided that profits with respect to co-investment in the securities offered on the platform or mechanism would not be considered impermissible compensation for purposes of the Section 4(b) Exemption. The SEC also advised that, assuming all conditions are met, the Section 4(b) Exemption does not limit the types of persons who are permitted to maintain a platform or mechanism for an issuer’s securities. Accordingly, associated persons of issuers that otherwise qualify for the Section 4(b) Exemption may rely on it to be exempt from broker-dealer registration; however, the employees of an internal marketing department or the investor relations department of an affiliated adviser of a complex of privately offered funds may not rely on the Section 4(b) Exemption if such employees are paid salaries to promote, offer and sell shares of the privately offered funds.

Click here to read the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets Frequently Asked Questions.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.