SEC Offers Custody Rule Relief to Venture Capital and Private Equity Funds


Following the adoption of the Dodd-Frank Act and amendments to the rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) adopted by the SEC, many previously unregistered managers to private funds, including venture capital and private equity funds, were required to register with the SEC under the Advisers Act. Among the new regulatory guidelines and restrictions that these managers became subject to was SEC Rule 206(4)-2 (the “Custody Rule”), which provides that securities and other assets over which an adviser has custody must be held by a “qualified custodian” (typically a bank, broker-dealer or trust company). Although the Custody Rule does contain a carve-out for “privately offered securities,” this exemption was limited to uncertificated securities that were restricted as to transfer. For many managers of private funds whose investments were limited to securities issued in private placements, but which were evidenced by a stock certificate, the result was a need retain a qualified custodian to hold the fund’s stock certificates and other physical evidences of their investments.

Last week the SEC issued IM Guidance Update No. 2013-04, which provides relief from the requirements of the Custody Rule with respect to certain privately offered securities, notwithstanding that that such securities were evidence by a certificate. Based on this guidance, certificates will not be required to be held by a qualified custodian, provided that the following factors are met:

  1. the client is a pooled investment vehicle that issues audited financial statements in compliance with the Custody Rule;
  2. the certificate can only be used to effect a transfer or to otherwise facilitate a change in beneficial ownership of the security with the prior consent of the issuer or the holders of the outstanding securities of the issuer;
  3. ownership of the security is recorded on the books of the issuer or its transfer agent in the name of the client (ie. the fund);
  4. the private stock certificate contains a legend restricting transfer; and
  5. the private stock certificate is appropriately safeguarded by the adviser and can be replaced upon loss or destruction.

A full copy of the release may be found here.

Advisers to private funds that invest solely in privately offered securities meeting the above criteria may want to examine their custody arrangements to determine what is appropriate based on their funds’ investment strategies.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.