SEC Proposes Rules for CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

by Dechert LLP
Contact

On September 18, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules that would require public companies to disclose the median annual total compensation of all their employees and the ratio of such median to the annual total compensation of their CEO (commonly referred to as the “pay ratio disclosure” requirement).1 This Newsflash is intended to provide a brief overview of the proposed rules. We will be providing a future OnPoint with a more comprehensive discussion. 

 Highlights of Proposed Rules: 
  • Most companies would not be required to make their first pay ratio disclosure until the 2016 proxy season, assuming the proposed rules do not become effective until 2014

  • Would apply to most public companies, including voluntary filers, but would not apply to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies or foreign private issuers 

  • Disclosure required in Form 10-K would be permitted to be incorporated from subsequently filed proxy statement

  • Median determination would be with respect to all employees of the company and its subsidiaries as of the last day of prior fiscal year, including part-time, temporary, seasonal and non-U.S. employees

  • No particular methodology would be required to determine the median—companies would be permitted to use any consistently applied compensation measure (e.g., W-2 wages) and reasonable estimates, rather than existing proxy statement pay calculation rules, and would be permitted to limit the calculation to a subset of employees selected through statistical sampling or other reasonable methods 

  • After identifying the median employee, companies would be required to apply the proxy pay calculation rules to calculate the pay of only that employee and the CEO to determine the pay ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The proposed rules would provide public companies with flexibility to determine the median total annual compensation of their employees and calculate the pay ratio in a way that is appropriate for the size and structure of the company. In identifying the median, companies would not be required to use existing proxy statement pay calculation rules to calculate total compensation and would not be required to calculate total compensation for all their employees. Instead, companies would be permitted to use any consistently applied compensation measure (e.g., W-2 wages) and reasonable estimates to calculate the annual total compensation for employees other than the CEO, and companies would be permitted to limit the calculation to a subset of employees selected through statistical sampling or other reasonable methods. Companies would be required to disclose the methodology used to identify the median and any material assumptions, adjustments or estimates used in the median calculations.

After identifying the median, companies would then be required to use existing proxy statement pay calculation rules to calculate total compensation for the median employee and the CEO so that the pay ratio reflects an “apples to apples” comparison. The disclosure would be required to be presented as a ratio of the median pay to the CEO pay, or as a multiple of the CEO pay. For example, if the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is $50,000 and the annual total compensation of the CEO is $500,000, the pay ratio would be disclosed as “1 to 10” or as “the CEO’s annual total compensation is 10 times that of the median of the annual total compensation of all employees.” 

Despite the flexibility provided for in the proposed rules, if they are finalized in their current form they would likely impose a substantial administrative burden. The proposed rules would require including all employees, as of the last day of the company’s last completed fiscal year, in the identification of the median. This means not only full-time, U.S. employees of the registrant, but also part-time, seasonal, temporary and non-U.S. employees, as well as employees employed by subsidiaries. Furthermore, companies would not be permitted to make full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees, annualize compensation for temporary and seasonal employees, or make any cost-of-living adjustments for non-U.S. employees. However, the proposed rules would permit (but not require) companies to annualize the total compensation of permanent employees who did not work the full fiscal year.

Companies would be subject to the pay ratio disclosure requirement for their first fiscal year commencing on or after the effective date of the final rules. Assuming the rules will not be finalized before year-end, the first disclosure for calendar year companies would be required in 2016 with respect to 2015 compensation. The pay ratio disclosure requirement would not apply to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies or foreign private issuers. A new registrant (e.g., an IPO filer) would not be required to comply until the Form 10-K or proxy statement for its first fiscal year commencing on or after the date it becomes subject to SEC reporting requirements.

The pay ratio disclosure would be required in annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements and proxy and information statements. As with other executive compensation disclosure, companies would be permitted to satisfy the pay ratio disclosure requirement in Form 10-K by incorporating the information from their subsequently filed proxy statements. Pay ratio disclosure would be considered “filed” not “furnished,” and, therefore, would be subject to liability under the Securities Act and Exchange Act.

Reflecting the controversy that has surrounded Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act ever since its enactment, the SEC’s decision to issue the proposed rules was by no means unanimous. The 3-2 vote in favor of proposing the pay ratio disclosure involved clear dissent, including the comment from Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher that “[the] only conceivable purpose [of the proposed rules] is to name and, presumably in the view of its proponents, shame U.S. issuers and their executives” and that “[t]his political wish-list mandate represents another page of the Dodd-Frank playbook for special interest groups who seem intent on turning the notion of materiality-based disclosure on its head.”

Footnotes

1 The SEC proposed the rules to implement Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.

 

Written by:

Dechert LLP
Contact
more
less

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.