Hollander, Cardio-Health vs. Prevention Concepts, Barth, etc., et al

Second Amended Complaint

more+
less-

Complaint filed in California (Los Angeles) Superior Court, alleging causes of action for

1. BREACH OF ORAL CONTRACT

2. BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACTS

3. BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH & FAIR DEALING

4. FRAUD

5. DECLARATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST

6. CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

7. AN ACCOUNTING

8. DECLARATORY RELIEF

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Pleadings | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Richard Farkas, Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Richard Farkas
Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas

Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas Founded in 1981, the Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas, based in... View Profile »


Follow Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas:

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×