Second Circuit Answers Call from TCPA Plaintiff


After two failed calls in the Eastern District of New York, the Second Circuit last week opened the line for one TCPA plaintiff to plead his case.

On March 12, 2013, Judge William F. Kuntz II of the Eastern District of New York sua sponte dismissed putative class action claims arising under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and its accompanying rules and regulations for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Bank v. Independence Energy Group LLC. Relying on Second Circuit precedents, the Court held that state courts have exclusive jurisdiction over private actions brought under the TCPA, and that New York’s procedural rules bar TCPA class actions in the federal courts. In what appeared to be a missed call, Judge Kuntz did not discuss the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, which held that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over such actions. In later denying a motion for reconsideration, however, the Bank court said there was no connection: the Mims language was merely dicta, and the law in the Second Circuit remained unchanged.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.