In its long-awaited decision in United States v. Caronia, the Second Circuit ruled today that the First Amendment bars the criminal prosecution of pharmaceutical manufacturers or their sales representatives for truthful, non-misleading speech promoting the lawful, off-label use of an FDA-approved drug. By a vote of two-to-one, the panel vacated the conviction of a pharmaceutical sales representative for conspiracy to introduce a misbranded drug into interstate commerce in violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). The Second Circuit recognized that criminalizing a drug manufacturer’s speech about a drug’s lawful, off-label use would violate the First Amendment; the court therefore construed the FDCA not to prohibit such speech. The majority did not decide whether, or to what extent, the First Amendment would allow the government to rely upon a pharmaceutical manufacturer’s promotional statements regarding off-label uses as evidence of the drug’s “intended use” in a prosecution for introducing a drug into commerce without “adequate instructions for use.” The majority’s analysis calls into serious doubt, however, the government’s ability to prosecute a misbranding charge based on off-label promotion or, more broadly, to rely upon a drug manufacturer’s dissemination of truthful, non-misleading information about a drug’s off-label uses in such a prosecution.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Criminal Prosecution, FDCA, Free Speech, Marketing, Off-Label Use, Pharmaceutical
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Ropes & Gray LLP | Attorney Advertising