Securities Claim in Canada Under Canadian Securities, Mirror Image To Morrison Claims Under U.S. Securities Laws, Permitted To Proceed


As a matter of international litigation practice, the changes wrought by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison have been fundamental.  In the Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank (No. 08-1191), the Court held that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 did not provide a private cause of action in “foreign-cubed” cases—cases where foreign plaintiffs sue foreign defendants for misconduct in connection with securities traded on foreign exchanges (hence “foreign cubed”).  The Court rejected over 40 years of lower-court jurisprudence – which focused on where “conduct” and “effects” occurred or would be felt to determine the reach of Rule 10b-5.  Instead the Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) reaches frauds only where “the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange” 

In various blog postings, we have followed decisions in other jurisdictions to see whether non-U.S. jurisdictions are applying the same analysis under their own statutes as Morrison did under U.S. securities laws.   A recent example of that is the judicial decision in Tajdin Abdula v. Canadian Solar Inc., 2011 ONSC 5105 (Super. Ct. of Justice Ontario 2011).  In this case, the court addressed a motion to dismiss claims for negligent misrepresentation and statutory causes of action based on an alleged failure of jurisdiction.  Although the plaintiff and at least certain of the defendants resided in Canada, its principal place of business is China, “where the majority of its senior executive officers reside and where the majority of its manufacturing operations occur”.  More important, as the court said,  the plaintiff purchased a total of 2000 shares of Canadian Solar between January 21 and May 4, 2010. These purchases were conducted by the plaintiff logging into an account with BMO Investor Line using his home computer.  The Court explained: 

“The shares of Canadian Solar are traded only on the NASDAQ Exchange. Each of the plaintiff’s purchases resulted in the issue of Confirmation Notice by BMO InvestorLine from an office in Toronto. Each of the Confirmation Notices contained the following wording: AS AGENTS, WE CONFIRM THE FOLLOWING BUY FORYOUR ACCOUNT OVER THE COUNTER– U.S.A.”

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.