Selecting a Party-Appointed Arbitrator in the US

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

Arbitration analysis: Selecting an arbitrator is one of the most important strategic considerations in an arbitration. While an arbitrator's neutrality and impartiality is widely assumed to be the norm (especially internationally), tribunals in the United States have historically allowed commercial arbitrators to exhibit differing degrees of partiality. Here, David J. McLean of Latham & Watkins' New York office discusses the background to party-appointments in the US and discusses the practice in modern international arbitration.

Questions about the permitted partiality of party-appointed arbitrators in the United States have been much debated and the answers have evolved over the years. Having a partisan arbitrator may seem like an advantage, but as the norm has moved towards favouring neutral arbitrators, parties need to strategise carefully when selecting partisan arbitrators so as not to overplay their position.

Originally published on LexisPSL Arbitration.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide