Senate Hearing Takes Aim on Offshore Tax Evasion

by Holland & Knight LLP
Contact

Today, February 26, 2014, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing on offshore tax evasion titled “Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts.” Prior to the hearing, the Subcommittee released this report pursuant to the hearing.1

When Senator Carl Levin, the Subcommittee’s Chairman announced the hearing on February 19, 2014, he stated that “the hearing will continue the Subcommittee's examination of tax haven bank facilitation of U.S. tax evasion, focusing on the status of efforts to hold Swiss banks and their U.S. clients accountable for unpaid taxes on billions of dollars in hidden assets.”2

The media has indicated that the hearing will address the stalled criminal investigation into 14 Swiss banks, and include witnesses from a Swiss bank and the Department of Justice.3 Furthermore, the February 24 Bloomberg BNA Daily Tax Report reflected that the following speakers will testify at the hearing:  Credit Suisse Group AG Chief Executive Officer Brady Dougan, Hans-Ulrich Meister and Robert Shafir, the co-heads of Credit Suisse's Swiss private banking and wealth management, and Romeo Cerutti, the bank's general counsel.  They will be joined by United States Deputy Attorney General James Cole and Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Keneally from the Justice Department.4

Coincidentally, the US Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) issued a report on the same day that the hearing was announced that analyzed 12,889 FBARs filed to report foreign accounts held in 2008.  These FBARs were filed by participants in the 2009 offshore voluntary disclosure program.5 The report identifies the countries in which the foreign bank accounts reported on the FBARs were located as well as the states where the account holders reside.

When discussing the location of the foreign bank accounts, the GAO report stated:  “[c]onsistent with IRS’s enforcement efforts and the design of the 2009 OVDP, we found that the population of participants was more likely to report offshore accounts in Switzerland than other locations. Note that each FBAR could report multiple financial accounts and multiple financial institution mailing addresses. In our review of a sample of 2009 OVDP case files, we found that some participants disclosed dozens of offshore accounts with multiple banks and in multiple countries; in other cases, participants disclosed only one account. When reporting the geographic distribution of offshore accounts, we counted the number of FBARs in which a specific country/territory code appeared at least once.”

As the GAO noted, 42% of the accounts reported on the 2008 FBARs studied (or 5,427 accounts) were held in Switzerland; 8% were held in the United Kingdom (or 1,058 accounts); 4% were held in Canada, France, Israel and Germany with 556, 528, 510 and 484 accounts reported respectively.

When discussing the state of residence, the GAO report indicates that its findings could be skewed by the fact that the address reflected on an FBAR may not belong to the participant, but rather the participant’s accountant or attorney. Notwithstanding, it noted that the states with the largest percentage of participants also happened to be states where taxpayers generally receive higher incomes than the average.  24% of the FBARs filed in the 2009 voluntary disclosure program for 2008 accounts were filed by participants residing in Californiaw (2,524).  18% of the filed FBARs reflected New York addresses (1,844), followed by Florida which had 10% (1,022) and Texas, which had 5% (512).  It is interesting to note that these four states also have rather large immigrant populations. These individuals may, in fact, continue to have ties to their country of origin and continue to hold accounts that were opened well before coming to the United States.   The fact that for many Switzerland was the preferred country should be no surprise, since having wealth in many parts of the world is dangerous, and Switzerland would naturally be a safe haven.

According to its website, the GAO “the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress” and “exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the federal government for the American people.”

GAO conducted this study in response to a request from Senator Levin’s Subcommittee to update its March 2013 report where it chastised the IRS for not pursuing taxpayers who filed quiet disclosures.  The earlier GAO report noted that the success of the IRS voluntary disclosure program was premised upon taxpayers utilizing it, and if other taxpayers could file quiet disclosures and avoid penalties, then the disclosure programs would become useless.6


1 Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Report
2 http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/offshore-tax-evasion-the-effort-to-collect-unpaid-taxes-on-billions-in-hidden-offshore-accounts
3 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-19/offshore-tax-evasion-will-be-focus-of-senate-hearing.html; http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/Offshore-Tax-Evasion-Crackdown-Focus-Senate-Hearing-69656-1.html
4 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-24/credit-suisse-s-dougan-to-testify-at-senate-tax-hearing.html
5 http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/660005.pdf
6 http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/653369.pdf - See more at: http://www.hklaw.com/TaxBlog/Senate-Hearing-Takes-Aim-on-Offshore-Tax-Evasion-02-26-2014/#sthash.s8f9zNOc.dpuf

Today, February 26, 2014, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing on offshore tax evasion titled “Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts.” Prior to the hearing, the Subcommittee released this report pursuant to the hearing.1

When Senator Carl Levin, the Subcommittee’s Chairman announced the hearing on February 19, 2014, he stated that “the hearing will continue the Subcommittee's examination of tax haven bank facilitation of U.S. tax evasion, focusing on the status of efforts to hold Swiss banks and their U.S. clients accountable for unpaid taxes on billions of dollars in hidden assets.”2

The media has indicated that the hearing will address the stalled criminal investigation into 14 Swiss banks, and include witnesses from a Swiss bank and the Department of Justice.3 Furthermore, the February 24 Bloomberg BNA Daily Tax Report reflected that the following speakers will testify at the hearing: Credit Suisse Group AG Chief Executive Officer Brady Dougan, Hans-Ulrich Meister and Robert Shafir, the co-heads of Credit Suisse's Swiss private banking and wealth management, and Romeo Cerutti, the bank's general counsel.  They will be joined by United States Deputy Attorney General James Cole and Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Keneally from the Justice Department.4

Coincidentally, the US Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) issued a report on the same day that the hearing was announced that analyzed 12,889 FBARs filed to report foreign accounts held in 2008.  These FBARs were filed by participants in the 2009 offshore voluntary disclosure program.5 The report identifies the countries in which the foreign bank accounts reported on the FBARs were located as well as the states where the account holders reside.

When discussing the location of the foreign bank accounts, the GAO report stated:  “[c]onsistent with IRS’s enforcement efforts and the design of the 2009 OVDP, we found that the population of participants was more likely to report offshore accounts in Switzerland than other locations. Note that each FBAR could report multiple financial accounts and multiple financial institution mailing addresses. In our review of a sample of 2009 OVDP case files, we found that some participants disclosed dozens of offshore accounts with multiple banks and in multiple countries; in other cases, participants disclosed only one account. When reporting the geographic distribution of offshore accounts, we counted the number of FBARs in which a specific country/territory code appeared at least once.”

As the GAO noted, 42% of the accounts reported on the 2008 FBARs studied (or 5,427 accounts) were held in Switzerland; 8% were held in the United Kingdom (or 1,058 accounts); 4% were held in Canada, France, Israel and Germany with 556, 528, 510 and 484 accounts reported respectively.

When discussing the state of residence, the GAO report indicates that its findings could be skewed by the fact that the address reflected on an FBAR may not belong to the participant, but rather the participant’s accountant or attorney. Notwithstanding, it noted that the states with the largest percentage of participants also happened to be states where taxpayers generally receive higher incomes than the average. 24% of the FBARs filed in the 2009 voluntary disclosure program for 2008 accounts were filed by participants residing in Californiaw (2,524). 18% of the filed FBARs reflected New York addresses (1,844), followed by Florida which had 10% (1,022) and Texas, which had 5% (512). It is interesting to note that these four states also have rather large immigrant populations. These individuals may, in fact, continue to have ties to their country of origin and continue to hold accounts that were opened well before coming to the United States. The fact that for many Switzerland was the preferred country should be no surprise, since having wealth in many parts of the world is dangerous, and Switzerland would naturally be a safe haven.

According to its website, the GAO “the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress” and “exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the federal government for the American people.”

GAO conducted this study in response to a request from Senator Levin’s Subcommittee to update its March 2013 report where it chastised the IRS for not pursuing taxpayers who filed quiet disclosures. The earlier GAO report noted that the success of the IRS voluntary disclosure program was premised upon taxpayers utilizing it, and if other taxpayers could file quiet disclosures and avoid penalties, then the disclosure programs would become useless.6

1 Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Report
2 http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/offshore-tax-evasion-the-effort-to-collect-unpaid-taxes-on-billions-in-hidden-offshore-accounts
3 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-19/offshore-tax-evasion-will-be-focus-of-senate-hearing.html; http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/Offshore-Tax-Evasion-Crackdown-Focus-Senate-Hearing-69656-1.html
4 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-24/credit-suisse-s-dougan-to-testify-at-senate-tax-hearing.html
5 http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/660005.pdf
6 http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/653369.pdf

Written by:

Holland & Knight LLP
Contact
more
less

Holland & Knight LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.