Seventh Circuit Permits Parol Evidence to Prove Fraud in the Inducement Despite Lack of Fraud in Integration Clause

more+
less-

In this week's post, we take a look at the recent Seventh Circuit case Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Kenray Associates, Inc. that held that parol evidence could be used to prove fraud in the inducement of a contract – a settlement agreement and covenant not to execute – even though the contract contained an integration clause. The decision reversed a trial court decision holding that parol evidence could only be used to show that the integration clause itself was the product of fraud.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Contract Drafting, Contract Formation, Fraud, Fraudulent Inducement, Integration Clauses, Parol Evidence

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pavlack Law, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »