Seventh Circuit Rules that Medical Necessity Trumps State-Imposed Cap on “Optional” Medicaid Coverage

Cozen O'Connor
Contact

In a class action lawsuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit recently affirmed a lower court decision granting a preliminary injunction that prevented the state of Indiana from enforcing a $1,000 annual cap on Medicaid coverage for medically necessary dental services, and concluded the cap most likely violated rights granted to Medicaid beneficiaries under federal law. Bontrager v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20157 (September 26, 2012).

Under federal Medicaid law, coverage of “dental services” (like prescription drug coverage) is optional. Indiana elected to cover certain dental services that are medically reasonable and necessary and not listed as non-covered or otherwise excluded. However, the state imposed a $1,000 per recipient annual limit on such services. Plaintiffs brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the cap violated federal and state law because it prevented Medicaid beneficiaries from receiving medically necessary services above the cap.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Cozen O'Connor

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Cozen O'Connor on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide