Sexual Assault on Employee by Supervisor: Employer and Supervisor Liable for $620K

more+
less-

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a jury award of $470,000 in damages, plus a costs award of $150,000, against an employer and a supervisor for the supervisor’s sexual assault of an employee.

The employee, a commissioned salesperson with Deluxe Windows, was sexually assaulted four times by the supervisor, who was also a principal and part owner of the company. The supervisor was convicted criminally of sexual assault and was jailed. The employee had started employment with Deluxe Windows 18 months after moving to Canada.

At trial, the employee testified she felt shame and was afraid that she would be targeted again. She said that she was afraid to leave home and afraid to go shopping without her cell phone; she slept with double locks on her bedroom door, and purchased an alarm system for her home. She experienced nightmares where the supervisor was chasing her and attacking her children. She suffered from insomnia and had difficulty getting out of bed in the morning. She suffered a loss of sexual desire and experiences intermittent suicidal ideations.

The supervisor had argued that the employee’s past experiences, including experiences as a child, “materially contributed” to her current problems, so that the supervisor and employer should not be responsible for damages for all of her current troubles. The jury appears to have rejected that argument.

On appeal, the supervisor argued that the damages award was “grossly disproportionate” and far outside the range of awards in other cases. The Court of Appeal noted that the jury’s damage award was high and “outside of the generally expected range”. However, it was not plainly unreasonable or unjust.

This decision demonstrates that employers can be liable for assaults committed on employees by supervisors, and shows the significant potential damages. The damage award reinforces the need for employers to implement and enforce workplace violence prevention programs, particularly in light of Ontario’s Bill 168 amendments relating to workplace violence and harassment.

M.B. v. Deluxe Windows of Canada, http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2012/2012onca135/2012onca135.html.

Categories: Caselaw Developments, Other Safety Developments, Safety - Risk Management

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×