Shipper/Carrier Contracts - A Move towards Fixed Agreements on Price and Capacity


A consideration of potential changes in the market and how Reed Smith can assist in the light of such changes.

The traditional "gentlemen's agreement"

Traditionally, carriers' agreements with customers as regards how much cargo will be transported and at what price have taken the form of informal "gentlemen's agreements". This has allowed each party flexibility as regards the finer points of the agreement.

However, in the past couple of years the market has become far more volatile and rates can fluctuate by several hundreds of dollars within a short period of time. As a result, carriers have been trying to increase rates and surcharges wherever possible, while shippers have been seeking to renegotiate rates downwards. Such volatility, and inability of the parties to agree on a way to perform the contract at prices with which they are both satisfied, has led to an increasing number of difficulties in how to interpret these "gentlemen's agreements".

Parties who are faced with these difficulties of interpretation are starting to find themselves involved in litigation in an attempt to resolve them. The recent high profile claim brought by Argos against Maersk is the first recent example of a customer taking a carrier to court over a breach of contract. This is despite the fact that, according to the European Shippers' Council, several customers have complained in the last year that carriers have been ignoring terms and conditions previously agreed to. Although the Argos/Maersk case has recently settled, and so far no shippers have followed Argos' lead in commencing litigation, this case could open the door for other shippers to take similar action.

Going forward: fixed agreements on price and capacity

In the wake of the claim filed by Argos, Maersk announced that in future it proposes to focus on reaching fixed agreements with its customers on both price and capacity, and other major shipping lines may well wish to follow suit. Indeed, in statements following the recent settlement of the litigation both Argos and Maersk stated that their relationship would be on a "significantly firmer contractual basis" going forward.

Please see full Alert below for further information

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Reed Smith | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.