Ship’s Navigator Sentenced To Four Years For Criminal Negligence

more+
less-

A B.C. ship’s navigator has been sentenced to four years after he was convicted of criminal negligence causing death for dereliction of duty leading to his ship colliding with an island.

According to The Globe and Mail, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in sentencing Karl Lilgert after a jury found him guilty, said that Mr. Lilgert’s relationship with a female crew member of the ship, Queen of the North, led to the collision.

The judge called Mr. Lilgert’s failure to make a course correction “an extreme and catastrophic dereliction of his duty”.  She stated that the collision occurred while Mr. Lilgert was working alone on the bridge with his former lover, who worked on the ship, for the first time since they had ended a relationship.  The judge said that Mr. Lilgert had been distracted by personal issues relating to their relationship.

Two passengers on board – a couple – have not been seen since the ship went down, and were presumed to have died.

The case is another example of a worker being convicted criminally for workplace negligence – not for intentionally doing something unsafe, but rather for not doing something that he should have done.  Mr. Lilgert has appealed.

- See more at: http://www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com/ships-navigator-sentenced-to-four-years-for-criminal-negligence#sthash.D8b5PNDz.dpuf

A B.C. ship’s navigator has been sentenced to four years after he was convicted of criminal negligence causing death for dereliction of duty leading to his ship colliding with an island.

According to The Globe and Mail, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in sentencing Karl Lilgert after a jury found him guilty, said that Mr. Lilgert’s relationship with a female crew member of the ship, Queen of the North, led to the collision.

The judge called Mr. Lilgert’s failure to make a course correction “an extreme and catastrophic dereliction of his duty”.  She stated that the collision occurred while Mr. Lilgert was working alone on the bridge with his former lover, who worked on the ship, for the first time since they had ended a relationship.  The judge said that Mr. Lilgert had been distracted by personal issues relating to their relationship.

Two passengers on board – a couple – have not been seen since the ship went down, and were presumed to have died.

The case is another example of a worker being convicted criminally for workplace negligence – not for intentionally doing something unsafe, but rather for not doing something that he should have done.  Mr. Lilgert has appealed.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×