Should Estoppel Stop You From Requesting Inter Partes Reexamination?


Inter partes reexamination offers an attractive supplement (or even alternative) to litigation for challenging the validity of a patent. Unlike ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination advantageously enables a third party requester to participate in the prosecution, including any appeal.

Inter partes reexamination, however, is not without its risks. The estoppel aspect of the procedure is “the most frequently identified inequity that deters third parties from filing requests for inter partes reexamination of patents.”[1] Specifically, under 35 U.S.C. § 315(c), a third party requester may be estopped in litigation from challenging patent claims on invalidity grounds that were or could have been raised in the course of an inter partes reexamination.

Accordingly, as part of the decision to file an inter partes reexam, a party should carefully consider potential estoppels that could attach in a later district court proceeding. Such an inquiry can be difficult, as the statutes, rules, regulations, and related case law do not clearly define Section 315(c)'s estoppel provisions. And, although the USPTO has admitted that “there is widespread agreement that the estoppel provisions should be better defined,”[2] very little progress has been made so far.

Nevertheless, a party with an understanding of the language and history of Section 315(c) may be able to mitigate some of the risk. To assist with this inquiry, the following discussion identifies specific categories of prior art that may pose a relatively low risk of triggering Section 315(c) estoppel and, thus, may be preserved for future litigation.

Please see full update for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.