Should Tenants Worry About Environmental Liabilities For Their Leased Property?


EPA Issues “All Appropriate Inquiry” and “Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser” Guidance for Tenants

By 2013, most property owners have heard of the advantages of performing environmental due diligence and conducting “All Appropriate Inquiry” by obtaining an Environmental Site Assessment before purchase.  Doing so is key to obtaining federal “Superfund” landowner defenses and avoiding federal, state, or private party cleanup costs for contaminated property.  

But why should a Tenant perform environmental due diligence and conduct “All Appropriate Inquiry” before the Tenant signs a lease?  After all, it is “just a lease” and the owner of the property will be responsible for existing environmental contamination, right?

Under federal and state Superfund laws, Tenants may be considered “owners” or “operators” and, therefore, be subject to the same strict and joint-and-several liability for existing contamination as the actual fee owner, even historic contamination that the Tenant may not have known about.  While Landlords (also known as Lessors) often indemnify Tenants for environmental contamination, those indemnifications, or the resources of the Lessors, can often be inadequate to cover expensive cleanup costs.  And many property owners either acquired the property before modern environmental laws were in effect, or did not conduct adequate “All Appropriate Inquiry” to obtain Superfund landowner defenses.

EPA has just issued guidance clarifying that Tenants who conduct environmental due diligence and “All Appropriate Inquiry” before they sign a lease, may knowingly lease contaminated property, and still obtain the benefits of the Superfund landowner defense for “Bona Fide Prospective Purchasers” (BFPPs).  This is the case even if the owner of the property was not a BFPP, or if the owner of the property obtained but lost BFPP status, for example, by not taking “due care” to prevent a release.  Of course, the Tenant must also be aware of and discharge the (usually limited) responsibilities known as “continuing obligations” for contamination under the law, which include providing access to governmental authorities for cleanup and taking reasonable steps to minimize exposures and releases.

The pitfalls for Tenants under these circumstances will be similar to those that befall Lessors, such as failure to conduct “All Appropriate Inquiry” meeting federal standards (e.g., an Environmental Site Assessment that really complies with regulatory requirements) and failure to meet “continuing obligations.”

If you would like a copy of the guidance or to discuss its potential application, please email or call Mark Beliveau in Portsmouth, New Hampshire (603-373-2002 or or Ken Gray in Portland, Maine (207-791-1212 or

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pierce Atwood LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Pierce Atwood LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.