Social Media and Spoliation


As we discussed in our previous post regarding the Christou case, social media is discoverable – and consequently subject to a litigation hold. From an evidentiary standpoint, social media is not without its shortcomings, and it is important to understand that social media is vulnerable to irretrievable loss, through the acts of the account holder to delete the account, through malware and hacking, through the website administrator’s inadvertent error, or dozens of other possibilities. A recent case out of New Jersey, Gatto v. United Air Lines, highlights this vulnerability and the sanctions which arise from such irretrievable losses of potential evidence.

The plaintiff in Gatto was a baggage handler at JFK airport who suffered serious injuries that left him paralyzed. As part of their discovery, the defendants requested to look at the plaintiff’s social media accounts to evaluate the impact that his injury had on his lifestyle. The plaintiff authorized the defendants to access his social media accounts, except Facebook, which access was later granted in a pre-trial settlement conference.

The defense team briefly accessed the defendant’s Facebook account before the defendant deactivated the account. The plaintiff testified that he deactivated the account after having received multiple alerts regarding unfamiliar computers accessing the account. Roughly a month later, after a failed appeal for reactivation directed at Facebook itself, plaintiff’s counsel agreed to reactivate the account. However, both parties quickly discovered that the account had been “automatically deleted” fourteen days after deactivation.

The court did not find malice in the plaintiff’s actions, although the defense team provided evidence that the plaintiff would have had to take deliberate action to permanently delete his account. Because of the lack of malice, although the judge did grant the plaintiff’s adverse inference instruction, the court declined to levy any economic sanctions on the plaintiff.

The permanent deletion of a social media account is no different from burning potentially incriminating files, except that it can be done in a matter of seconds and is virtually impossible to tell whether it was done with or without malice.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Rogers Towers | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.