Solicitors’ negligence – Identifying the breach of duty


[co-authors: John Dillon; Emma Oberg]

The Court of Appeal decision in Liddy v Bazley [2013] NSWCA 319 is a reminder that a failure to commence proceedings within the limitation period will not necessarily sound in damages.

Mr Bazley, a prison officer at Parklea Prison, was assaulted and held hostage during a riot. As a result Mr Bazley was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. He retained solicitors but proceedings were not commenced within the limitation period. He sued his solicitors.

In the District Court, Williams DCJ upheld Mr Bazley’s claim and gave judgment in the amount of $270,019, being the value of the opportunity lost by the failure to commence proceedings. However, the Court of Appeal agreed with the solicitors’ submission that Mr Bazley would have been better off receiving workers’ compensation benefits and, if properly advised, would not have pursued the proceedings. The true breach in this case was that the solicitors failed to properly advise Mr Bazley not to commence proceedings. As a result, there was no loss.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


DLA Piper on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.