Solicitors’ negligence – Identifying the breach of duty


[co-authors: John Dillon; Emma Oberg]

The Court of Appeal decision in Liddy v Bazley [2013] NSWCA 319 is a reminder that a failure to commence proceedings within the limitation period will not necessarily sound in damages.

Mr Bazley, a prison officer at Parklea Prison, was assaulted and held hostage during a riot. As a result Mr Bazley was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. He retained solicitors but proceedings were not commenced within the limitation period. He sued his solicitors.

In the District Court, Williams DCJ upheld Mr Bazley’s claim and gave judgment in the amount of $270,019, being the value of the opportunity lost by the failure to commence proceedings. However, the Court of Appeal agreed with the solicitors’ submission that Mr Bazley would have been better off receiving workers’ compensation benefits and, if properly advised, would not have pursued the proceedings. The true breach in this case was that the solicitors failed to properly advise Mr Bazley not to commence proceedings. As a result, there was no loss.

Topics:  Breach of Duty, Negligence, Statute of Limitations

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »