Some Practical Approaches to Prosecution of Patents for Computer or Software Implemented Inventions

by PretiFlaherty
Contact

The patentability of inventions implemented with a computer or based on software have come under increased scrutiny in recent years.  One of the primary issues related to the increased scrutiny is whether the patent disclosure satisfies the statutory requirements of 35 U.S.C. §101.  One aspect of these requirements for patent eligibility generally mandates that the invention not be directed wholly to an abstract idea.  One of the precepts for determining patent eligibility in accordance with this aspect is that a concept that is otherwise obvious, or non-patentable, such as abstract ideas, does not attain patentable status by being implemented on a computer or in software.  Aside from the current judicial scrutiny on when computer or software implemented inventions qualify for patent eligibility, the question addressed here is what steps can presently be taken in patent applications to address objections or rejections under §101 that are presented by Patent Examiners.

The issue of patentability for inventions that are implemented on a computer or in software has been addressed in numerous judicial venues and within the Patent Office, with clear guidelines for what qualifies as statutory subject matter being somewhat elusive.  At present, the Supreme Court of the United States is considering the question in the case of Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l., (Docket No. 13-298 U.S.; Appeal from 717 F.3d 1269, 106 U.S.P.Q.2d 1696 (Fed. Cir. 2013).  Oral argument was presented in that case on March 31, 2014, and a full spectrum of views were referenced regarding whether or when an invention implemented on a computer or in software is an abstract idea, or would otherwise be eligible or ineligible for patentability under §101.  What has become clear in this court case is that the question of patentability for computer implemented or software inventions is difficult to answer in the general case.  Rather, it appears that the question of patentability is answered with respect to specific case examples, with commentary on the case indicating that it will be unlikely that the Supreme Court will announce a significantly broad change in patent law for these types of cases.

Assuming, therefore, that computer or software implemented inventions will continue to be eligible for patentability in some form, the question remains as to how will Examiners and the Patent Office apply the statutory requirements under §101 in these types of patent applications.  Based on a review of positions taken by Examiners in cases dealing with computer or software implemented inventions, there appear to be several guidelines for prosecuting such applications with regard to terminology that Examiners tend to accept as compliant with §101.

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2013), Chief Judge Rader of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit noted several factors to consider in determining eligibility of computer or software based inventions.  Judge Rader noted that tying a claim to a computer is an important indication of patent eligibility, since such a tie moves the claimed subject matter away from an abstract idea.  He also indicated that if the claims define an application of an abstract idea, rather than an abstract idea itself, they are more likely to be patent eligible.
 
Judge Rader also addressed application of the machine-or-transformation test for determining eligibility under §101.  This test states that a claim to a process must recite implementation with a particular, non-trivial machine, or transform an article from one thing or state to another.  In Judge Rader’s view, the machine or transformation test has far less application to inventions of the information age, since these inventions defy easy classification under such a test.  In Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010), the Supreme Court rejected the machine-or-transformation test as a sole test of patentability under §101.  Nevertheless, the machine-or-transformation test continues to be used by the Patent Office as the only test for patent eligibility of computer or software-based patent application claims under §101.  In addition, the Patent Office focuses on whether the claim language includes insignificant pre-, current or post-solution activity to meet the requirements of §101.

Given the above noted issues in pursuing a patent for computer or software implemented inventions, a review of how Patent Examiners are treating such inventions under §101 can provide at least some practical assistance in determining patent eligibility for these types of inventions.  The approach taken by a number of Patent Examiners provides some useful insights into how or if a claim can be made to comply with §101, and provides some of the evolving claim terminology usages that appear to find acceptance.

For example, Patent Examiners have found that terms related to collecting or recording data in a patent claim tend to be identified with patent ineligibility.  Terms used to define steps in a method claim such as “receiving,” “forwarding,” “displaying,” “collecting,” “storing,” “associating,” “establishing” or “refining” data have been viewed by certain Patent Examiners as representing insignificant solution activities with respect to determinations of patent eligibility.  Accordingly, while these method step terms need not be avoided, they may not by themselves make a claim eligible for patent.

Some method step terms that Patent Examiners have found to indicate significant solution activities, which tend to meet the requirements for patent eligibility, include “monitoring,” “comparing” and “matching.”  This terminology implies real-world operations, which appear to rise above the threshold of mere data manipulation, and produce a result that is at least logically tangible.

However, use of such claim terminology may still not qualify a claim for patent eligibility under §101.  Even where method step claim terms are deemed to represent significant solution activity with respect to patent eligibility, the threshold for complying with §101 may not necessarily be met in the view of a Patent Examiner, until the clauses using such terms also assign the activities to a specific machine or machine component.  Accordingly, reciting a particular physical or systemic component in each clause of a method claim that also uses significant solution activity terms can help to comply with the requirements of §101.

Thus, although the specifics of eligibility of computer or software implemented inventions continues to be debated at different levels of the judicial and patent system, there at least appear to be some practices that can be of assistance in pursuing such inventions for patent protection.  For example, the chances for eligibility of computer or software implemented inventions for patent protection appear to be improved by (1) always reciting a machine, e.g., a processor and a memory for implementing the method, (2) using “significant” solution activity terminology for the method steps that produce a conceptually tangible result, and not mere data manipulation and (3) potentially including a machine or machine component recitation in each clause of the method steps.  In addition, it is often helpful to include a “system” claim that is drafted in terms of components and their cooperative relationships, where the components can be described in terms of their functional operation, e.g., a “run-time engine” that manipulates or operates in conjunction with other components defined within a computer or software environment.

Although the definition of an abstract idea will likely continue to be debated in the context of patent eligibility, patents for computer or software implemented inventions will continue to be issued.  The above noted practices can be of use in dealing with the present cycle of scrutiny related to patentability for computer or software implemented inventions and will hopefully serve to increase the overall quality of patents that issue for these types of inventions.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© PretiFlaherty | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

PretiFlaherty
Contact
more
less

PretiFlaherty on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!