Sonic-Calabasas II: A New Wrinkle In Arbitration Law In California

by Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact

The California Supreme Court’s decision in Sonic Calabassas A, Inc. v. Moreno has the potential to eliminate a powerful tool used by employers to avoid administrative hearings before the California Department of Labor, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE).  Not only that, but the Court has made the already confusing body of law in Calfiornia concerning arbitration agreements even more confusing and it has thumbed its nose at U.S. Supreme Court decisions which command a different ruling.

Background

In 2011, in Concepcion v. AT&T Mobility, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the California Supreme Court’s rule that class action waivers were per se unconscionable.  Instead, it found that the expedient resolution of lawsuits was a “fundamental attribute” of arbitration and that a class action would run contrary to that purpose.  As a result, California’s unconscionability rules, as applied to class action waivers, were pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), a federal statute which favors arbitration.

This past summer, in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the so-called “effective vindication” doctrine – a rule which had been adopted by California courts among others.  That doctrine found that parties could not be compelled to arbitration when doing so would be so costly or inefficient that they would be deprived of the opportunity to effectively vindicate their legal rights.

These U.S. Supreme Court decisions are binding on California courts, including the California Supreme Court.  That is because the FAA provides a strong presumption favoring arbitration, regardless of whether a case is brought in state or federal court.

It is against this background that the California Supreme Court was called upon to decide whether it was unconscionable for an employee to agree to arbitrate claims and forego his right to an administrative Berman hearing before the DLSE.  This was the second time the California Supreme Court faced the issue.

The Sonic-Calabasas cases

The first time, in what is now called Sonic-Calabasas I, the California Supreme Court held that such an agreement was per se unconscionable.  But, this decision was issued after Concepcion and Italian Colors.  The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the California Supreme Court’s decision and instructed the California Supreme Court to review its decision in light of Concepcion.

The California Supreme Court was left with no choice but to find that the FAA pre-empted its decision in Sonic Calabassas I that waivers of Berman hearings in favor of arbitration were per se unconscionable.   But that is only where the inquiry begins.

It then declared that the waiver of a Berman hearing is nevertheless a “factor” that a court can consider in determining the validity of an arbitration agreement, adopting a “totality of the circumstances” test.  But rather than providing a bright-line rule as to when and how that “factor” applies, the court simply said that a Berman hearing waiver is permissible only if the legal process available to the employee is “accessible, affordable, low-cost, speedy, and effective” – a standard that other justices derided as being “hopelessly vague.”

Quick Takes

This decision seems to be very thin ice indeed, but it may be a while before the U.S. Supreme Court has its say.  As we have cautioned before, the California Supreme Court and its appellate courts find creative ways to avoid following the rules imposed by the FAA and the U.S. Supreme Court and, in fact, this decision is very difficult to square with Concepcion and Italian Colors.  The California Supreme Court’s decision seems to apply a different standard to arbitration agreements involving the waiver of Berman hearings than it does with other contracts – the very problem the FAA was designed to address.  And, the decision does seem to impose a very vague standard as to when these type of arbitration agreements are enforceable, leaving the lower courts with wide latitude to enforce or reject them.

For the time being, however, Sonic Calabasas II is the law of California.  While Berman  hearing waivers serve a very important purpose, especially given the perceived pro-employee bias of the DLSE, it may take another slap-down from the U.S. Supreme Court before California courts are required to enforce them.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact
more
less

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!