Sovereign Immunity Not Waived for Non-Extreme, Even Highly Unfair Results, Absent Express and Unambiguous Waivers by Statute or Regulation

more+
less-

In prior postings we have tried to identify cases where courts have drawn distinctions between U.S. and non-U.S. citizens in terms of according them rights and entitlements in connection with international disputes. In the area of application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in particular there has been a growing debate concerning whether U.S. citizens should be treated the same, better, or worse than non-U.S. citizens when they bring suit against non-U.S. sovereigns.

What is the law on the related question of when is U.S. immunity waived or not waived when dealing with conduct that creates what the court calls real unfairness but that doesn’t rise to the level of international terror, torture, or similar wrong?

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Civil Rights Updates, International Trade Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »