From time to time in litigation, opposing sides exchange harsh and even arguably slanderous words. The good news is that in some circumstances, those exchanges are privileged and protected from defamation claims.
In Richmond v. McHale, 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2 (January 4, 2012), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that allegedly defamatory statements made during a discovery meeting were absolutely protected by judicial privilege. The court affirmed the trial court order sustaining the appellee’s preliminary objections and dismissing the appellant’s complaint.
Please see full Alert below for further information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Procedure Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP | Attorney Advertising