In This Issue:
Factor Representation: Is It Unconstitutional for a State to Have It Both Ways?; Upcoming Speaking Engagements; Expanded California Sales and Use Tax Exclusions for Advanced Manufacturing Projects; and Redefining “Business Income”: What Recent Decisions by the Oregon and Pennsylvania Supreme Courts Tell Us About the State of Business Income.
Excerpt from Factor Representation: Is It Unconstitutional for a State to Have It Both Ways? -
A state cannot include income in the apportionable base and then exclude the receipts and related factors that generated that very same income from the apportionment formula. Factor representation is not only a matter of being fair, it is mandated by the U.S. Constitution.
Please see full issue below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.