Stay Before Institution Decision Would be Premature


In Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market, Inc., CBM2014-00114, Paper 4, April 15, 2014), petitioner sought a stay of co-opending inter partes reexamination, in view of the covered business method review that it filed.   The Board denied the stay as premature because it had yet to determine whether to institute a covered business method patent review of the patent.  The Board indicated that petitioer could renew its motion if a covered business method patent review is instituted.

Topics:  Covered Business Method Patents, Inter Partes Review Proceedings

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »