To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In GoerTek, Inc. v. Knowles Electronics, LLC, IPR2014-01009, Paper 7, (August 29, 2014), the Board denied the patent owner’s motion to stay a concurrent reexamination as premature, when the Board had not yet instituted a inter partes review.
Topics: Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Motion To Stay, Patent Litigation, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…
…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.
Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »
Harness Dickey, founded in Michigan in 1921, specializes in intellectual property law. The firm’s...
View Profile »
See more »
Back to Top