Supreme Court Agrees To Decide Procedure for Enforcing Forum Selection Clauses


Agreeing to review an important issue that has divided the federal circuit courts, the U.S. Supreme Court announced yesterday that it will decide the proper procedural vehicle for enforcing forum selection clauses.

A forum selection clause is a contract provision specifying that disputes will be resolved a particular venue. Such clauses are widely used in commercial and consumer contracts, often in conjunction with arbitration provisions.

At issue is the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in In re: Atlantic Marine Construction Co., Inc. that the enforceability of forum selection clauses should be evaluated under the federal transfer statute, which permits district courts to transfer venue of a civil action based upon the “convenience of parties and witnesses” and “the interest of justice.”

A majority of the federal circuit courts, including the Second, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, have held that a forum selection clause should be enforced by a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), without considering the discretionary factors embodied in the federal transfer statute. These courts relied on prior Supreme Court decisions holding that forum selection clauses are prima facie valid and enforceable unless unreasonable under the circumstances and are binding even in a consumer contract not subject to negotiation.

Ballard Spahr frequently advises businesses on the use and enforceability of forum selection clauses in contracts, particularly in conjunction with arbitration provisions.

The Supreme Court will hold argument in Atlantic Marine and decide the case next Term.

Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products, its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws throughout the country, and its skill in litigation defense and avoidance (including pioneering work in pre-dispute arbitration programs).

The Group also produces the CFPB Monitor, a blog that focuses exclusively on important CFPB developments. To subscribe, use the link provided to the right.

For more information, please contact Alan S. Kaplinsky at 215.864.8544 or, or Mark J. Levin at 215.864.8235 or

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.