Supreme Court Corner Q2 2017

by DLA Piper
Contact

DLA Piper

RECENT DECISIONS

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
PATENT
– Decided: May 30, 2017

HOLDING: All patent rights of a product are exhausted when the product is sold, "regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to impose or the location of the sale."

The patent exhaustion doctrine imposes a limit on the "right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling." An en banc Federal Circuit had confirmed two exceptions to the scope of patent exhaustion: (1) patent holders may impose lawful restrictions as to post-sale use or resale because patent holders do not exhaust all their rights when such restrictions are agreed upon pre-sale; and (2) exhaustion does not apply to infringers for products protected by an American patent but sold overseas.

The Supreme Court reversed, finding patent exhaustion applies automatically when a patentee chooses to sell an item, eliminating all patent rights to that item. The Court held that exhaustion is "a limit on the scope of the patentee's rights," stating a sale exhausts "its patent rights, regardless of any post-sale restrictions the patentee purports to impose." Regarding foreign sales, the Court further held that exhaustion "does not depend on the patentee receiving some undefined premium for selling the right to access the American market," but rather "is triggered by the patentee's decision to give that item up and receive whatever fee it decides is appropriate for the article and the invention which it embodies."

Justice Ginsburg concurred with the Court's findings regarding restrictions on reuse or resale, but dissented in part as to international exhaustion.

SAS Institute Inc. v. Lee
PATENT
– Cert. Granted

ISSUE: Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must issue a final written decision on every claim challenged by the petitioner.

The America Invents Act created the inter partes review (IPR) process, whereby a third party may request review of any patent by the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Section 318(a) states if an IPR is instituted, "the [PTAB] shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner." SAS Institute filed an IPR petition challenging all 16 claims of a patent; the PTAB instituted review on and issued a final written decision regarding 9 of the challenged claims.

The Federal Circuit panel (2-1) held the statute does not require the PTAB to issue a final written decision on all claims challenged in the petition. Judge Pauline Newman dissented, noting partial review of all challenged claims defeats the purpose of IPRs, i.e., to substitute the PTAB's review for district court proceedings on validity.

Echoing Judge Newman's dissent, SAS argues allowing final written decisions on fewer than all challenged claims violates the plain language of the statute and the purpose of IPRs. Respondents argue the issue is not appealable because the AIA bars appellate review of institution decisions; that other provisions in the AIA are claim-specific, contemplating partial review; and the PTO's regulations, permitting institution on fewer than all challenged claims is reasonable and entitled to deference.

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC*
PATENT
– Decided: May 22, 2017

HOLDING: In the patent venue statute, "resides" as applied to domestic corporations refers only to the state of incorporation.

Patent venue statute 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) states that venue is appropriate "where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business." The Federal Circuit held that, when read with the general venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391, venue for patent suits was proper in any federal district in which the accused product had been sold.

A unanimous Supreme Court reversed, holding the word "resides," with respect to domestic corporations, is limited to the state of incorporation. The Court confirmed that this question was answered 60 years ago in Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp., 353 U.S. 222 (1957), which held "that 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions, and that it is not to be supplemented by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1391(c)." The Court explained it had "definitively and unambiguously held that the word 'residence'… refers only to the state of incorporation. Congress has not amended §1400(b) since Fourco, and neither party asks us to reconsider our holding in that case."

Accordingly, for domestic corporations, patent cases may only be brought where the defendant is incorporated or where the defendant has a regular and established place of business and has committed acts of infringement. This will have a significant impact on where patent cases are now filed. Many predict the Eastern District of Texas will see a decline in new patent cases, while the Districts of Delaware and Northern California will see an increase.

See more coverage of this decision.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.