Supreme Court Decides Caetano v. Massachusetts

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact

On March 21, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Caetano v. Massachusetts, No. 14-10078, reversing the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s decision upholding a Massachusetts law prohibiting the possession of stun guns. The Supreme Court rejected all three of the Massachusetts’ court’s explanations as inconsistent with the Court’s previous decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).

A Massachusetts statute prohibits the possession of stun guns, and the Massachusetts Supreme Court upheld the statute on three grounds: stun guns were not in common usage at the time the Second Amendment was enacted, stun guns are dangerous and unusual, and stun guns are not readily adaptable to use in the military.

The Supreme Court vacated the state court decision, holding that the state court’s stated reasons for upholding the law are inconsistent with Supreme Court jurisprudence. First, the fact that stun guns were not in common usage at the time the Second Amendment was enacted is inconsistent with Heller’s holding that the Second Amendment “extends … to … arms … that were not in existence at the time of the founding.” Second, the Massachusetts’ court’s determination that stun guns are “dangerous per se at common law and unusual” because they are a “thoroughly modern invention” is inconsistent with Heller for the same reason. Third, Massachusetts’ reasoning that stun guns are not readily adaptable to the military is also rejected by Heller. The Court remanded for further proceedings “not inconsistent” with its opinion.

The Court issued its decision per curiam. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, concurred in the judgment.

Download Opinion of the Court

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact
more
less

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide